
DET
85-73

CLE
86-72
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CLE wins
DET 1 · CLE 5 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CLE +11pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
leveland Guardians held off Detroit Tigers, 5–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Trey Sweeney
SS
2-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
CLE · top performer

Brayan Rocchio
SS
2-2
AB-H
2
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


DET
85-73
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.18 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 6-31 | 31 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
CLE
86-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-33 | 33 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
8
1
Runs
5
2
Errors
0
Current series
DET wins series 4-2
Season series
CLE leads series 8-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 17pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
T. Sweeney
SSBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1.000 OPS
J. Flaherty
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 6 K · 3 ER · 5 H
B. Rocchio
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2 R · 2.000 OPS
T. Bibee
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 5 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CLE beat DET 5-1.
Win probability
CLE vs DET
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSweeney · singled to right, Dingler to third.
Valera · homered to center (393 feet), Rocchio scored.
Kwan · singled to left, Rocchio scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
DET won 0 · CLE won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Meadows 1
Valera 2
Inn 4
Inn 5
Kwan 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Ram 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 565 plays
· ·
DET 1·CLE 5
Dingler grounded out to second.
· ·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
DET 1·CLE 5
Cade Smith pitches to Dillon Dingler
· ·
DET 1·CLE 5
Smith relieved Junis
·
DET 1·CLE 5
·
DET 1·CLE 5
McKinstry singled to left.
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Jakob Junis pitches to Zach McKinstry
·
DET 1·CLE 5
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pérez popped out to shortstop.
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Jakob Junis pitches to Wenceel Perez
·
DET 1·CLE 5
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Greene grounded out to second.
·
DET 1·CLE 5
+0.8pp
Pitch 8 : Ball In Play
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Jakob Junis pitches to Riley Greene
·
DET 1·CLE 5
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
1
Runs
5
6
Hits
8
2
Errors
0
6
TB
14
0
HR
1
2
BB
2
9
K
9
13
LOB
16
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 15 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 73 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.0%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
61.1%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.6%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.5%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.22 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.