
PIT
69-89

CIN
80-78
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
PIT
league avg
CIN
.745
OPS
.719
.709
.333
OBP
.318
.310
5.03
Runs / G
4.50
4.18
4.31
Team ERA
4.18
4.42
1.33
WHIP
1.30
1.40
9.4
K / 9
8.5
8.1
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
PIT 4 · CIN 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CIN +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 11th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
PIT · top performer

Jack Suwinski
RF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
CIN · top performer

Tyler Stephenson
C
5-4
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 47pp · Bottom 9th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .201 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .229 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .243 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .262 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .240 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .244 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| .264 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .224 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .160 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .141 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 85 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 16 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 21 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 37 | |
| Team | 11.0 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 201 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .257 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .270 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .264 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .266 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .235 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .233 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .226 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .220 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .234 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .349 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .243 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 42 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 96 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | |
| Team | 11.0 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 181 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
10
4
Runs
3
0
Errors
0
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
4
Runs
3
8
Hits
10
0
Errors
0
13
TB
17
0
HR
2
4
BB
3
12
K
14
15
LOB
23
Current series
CIN wins series 4-2
Season series
Series tied 6-6
How it ended
PIT beat CIN 4-3. J. Suwinski led the way — 1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS. Stephenson's play in the bottom 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (47pp).
Last play
End of the 11th inning
Win probability
CIN vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactStephenson · homered to left center (405 feet).
Marte · singled to center, Friedl to third.
Marte · grounded into fielder's choice to third, Benson out at third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
PIT won 3 · CIN won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Horwitz 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Horwitz 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Marte 1
Inn 9
Stephenson 1
Inn 10
Suwinski 1
Lux 1
Inn 11
Horwitz 1
Play-by-play · 716 plays
End of the 11th inning
PIT 4·CIN 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Marte grounded into fielder's choice to third, Benson out at third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
−27pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Yohan Ramirez pitches to Noelvi Marte
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Friedl walked, Benson to second, Espinal to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
+9pp
Pitch 8 : Ball 4
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Yohan Ramirez pitches to TJ Friedl
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
McLain fouled out to right.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
−14pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Yohan Ramirez pitches to Matt McLain
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Benson walked.
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
+5pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
PIT 4·CIN 3
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates went into Cincinnati Reds and beat them, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
124
projections · 105 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
58.4%
ensemble · CIN favored
Elo Static
57.7%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.7%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.6%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.45 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.