
STL
47-38

CLE
40-42
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
STL
league avg
CLE
.694
OPS
.720
.680
.315
OBP
.318
.311
4.35
Runs / G
4.50
3.93
4.15
Team ERA
4.18
▶3.75
1.34
WHIP
1.30
▶1.26
7.7
K / 9
8.5
▶9.4
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
STL 7 · CLE 0 (by 7)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked STL +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
STL · top performer

Jose Fermin
LF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
CLE · top performer

Carlos Santana
1B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 23pp · Top 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .297 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .263 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .248 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .249 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .224 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .271 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .221 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .200 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .244 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 96 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 26 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 156 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .295 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .140 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .309 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .232 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .168 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .234 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .231 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .176 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .113 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .222 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .224 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 29 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 11 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 98 | |
| 1.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 151 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSTL
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
3
7
Runs
0
0
Errors
2
Team stats
STL
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
7
Runs
0
11
Hits
3
0
Errors
2
18
TB
3
2
HR
0
3
BB
8
10
K
11
13
LOB
17
Current series
STL wins series 3-0
Season series
STL wins series 3-0
How it ended
STL beat CLE 7-0. J. Fermin led the way — 1-for-1 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS. Gorman's play in the top 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (23pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CLE vs STL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactGorman · homered to right center (428 feet), Winn scored and Contreras scored.
Scott II · homered to right (401 feet), Pagés scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period scoring
STL won 3 · CLE won 0
Inn 1
Gorman 3
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
II 2
Inn 8
Pag 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 597 plays
End of the 9th inning
STL 7·CLE 0
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Kwan flied out to left.
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
John King pitches to Steven Kwan
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Hedges flied out to right, Rodríguez to third.
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 8 : Ball In Play
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 7 : Ball 3
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
Rodríguez to second on wild pitch by King.
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Rodríguez to second on wild pitch by King.
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
John King pitches to Austin Hedges
· ·
STL 7·CLE 0
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Rodríguez walked.
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
STL 7·CLE 0
John King pitches to Johnathan Rodriguez
·
STL 7·CLE 0
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Schneemann struck out looking.
·
STL 7·CLE 0
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals went into Cleveland Guardians and beat them, 7–0. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 116 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
45.1%
ensemble · STL favored
Elo Static
46.9%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
46.8%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.3%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.22 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.