
DET
86-73

CLE
86-73
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
DET wins
DET 4 · CLE 2 (by 2)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CLE +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CLE | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
etroit Tigers went into Cleveland Guardians and beat them, 4–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Wenceel Perez
RF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CLE · top performer

CJ Kayfus
LF
2-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


DET
86-73
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-35 | 35 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
CLE
86-73
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.43 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 5-32 | 32 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 3 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 3 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
5
4
Runs
2
0
Errors
1
Current series
DET wins series 4-2
Season series
CLE wins series 8-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 10pp · Top 1st Inning
W. Perez
RFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.933 OPS
T. Melton
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 1 K · 1 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
C. Kayfus
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
P. Messick
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 7 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
How it ended
DET beat CLE 4-2.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactPérez homered to left center (395 feet).
Kayfus · doubled to right, Arias scored.
Greene · homered to right (411 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CLE | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
4
Runs
2
8
Hits
5
0
Errors
1
18
TB
8
3
HR
0
5
BB
2
10
K
8
14
LOB
10
Win probability
CLE vs DET
Period scoring
DET won 2 · CLE won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Kayfus 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Greene 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Ram 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 552 plays
End of the 9th inning
DET 4·CLE 2
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Naylor struck out swinging.
·
DET 4·CLE 2
−1pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Will Vest pitches to Bo Naylor
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Naylor hit for Noel
·
DET 4·CLE 2
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Martínez struck out swinging.
·
DET 4·CLE 2
−3pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Will Vest pitches to Angel Martinez
·
DET 4·CLE 2
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Arias struck out looking.
·
DET 4·CLE 2
−4pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Will Vest pitches to Gabriel Arias
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Vest relieved Finnegan
·
DET 4·CLE 2
Malloy as designated hitter.
DET 4·CLE 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
DET 4·CLE 2
Middle of the 9th inning
DET 4·CLE 2
· ·
DET 4·CLE 2
Torkelson lined out to third.
· ·
DET 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 4·CLE 2
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
1 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 73 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.5%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
62.1%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
62.2%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
62.4%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.13 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs