
CHW
58-101

NYY
91-68
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
NYY
.722
OPS
.720
.722
.316
OBP
.318
.309
4.76
Runs / G
4.50
4.57
4.08
Team ERA
4.18
▶3.34
1.30
WHIP
1.30
▶1.19
8.6
K / 9
8.5
▶9.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
NYY wins
CHW 3 · NYY 5 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked NYY +20pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| NYY | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
CHW · top performer

Michael A. Taylor
RF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
NYY · top performer

Aaron Judge
RF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 28pp · Bottom 5th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .257 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .242 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .231 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .272 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .232 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .272 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .200 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .257 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .236 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .138 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 30 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 85 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 39 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 31 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 160 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .236 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .330 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .269 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .254 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .264 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .245 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .221 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .212 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .203 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .277 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .257 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 82 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 24 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 131 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
NYY
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
8
3
Runs
5
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
NYY
Home
3
Runs
5
5
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
9
TB
11
1
HR
0
2
BB
7
8
K
8
8
LOB
22
Current series
NYY win series 3-0
Season series
NYY win series 6-1
How it ended
NYY beat CHW 5-3. A. Judge led the way — 2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.467 OPS. Stanton's play in the bottom 5th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (28pp).
Win probability
NYY vs CHW
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactM. Taylor · homered to right center (378 feet), Vargas scored.
Stanton · doubled to left, Judge scored, Rice scored and Bellinger scored.
Montgomery · doubled to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| NYY | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
CHW won 2 · NYY won 3
Inn 1
Rice 1
Inn 2
Julks 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Taylor 2
Inn 5
Stanton 3
Inn 6
Inn 7
Wells 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 577 plays
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Robertson struck out swinging.
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
+0.7pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
David Bednar pitches to Will Robertson
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Baldwin grounded out to shortstop.
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
+2pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 6 : Ball 1
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
David Bednar pitches to Brooks Baldwin
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Teel grounded out to third.
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
+3pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
David Bednar pitches to Kyle Teel
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Bednar relieved Williams
·
CHW 3·NYY 5
Goldschmidt at first base.
CHW 3·NYY 5
Top of the 9th inning
CHW 3·NYY 5
Recap · MLB
ew York Yankees held off Chicago White Sox, 5–3.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 117 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
69.9%
ensemble · NYY favored
Elo Static
70.3%
P(NYY win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
71.5%
P(NYY win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
70.3%
P(NYY win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.56 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.