
PIT
69-90

CIN
81-78
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
PIT
league avg
CIN
.740
OPS
.715
.710
.335
OBP
.319
.314
5.04
Runs / G
4.50
4.24
4.26
Team ERA
4.17
4.77
1.31
WHIP
1.31
1.47
9.1
K / 9
8.5
7.9
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
PIT 1 · CIN 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CIN +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds held off Pittsburgh Pirates, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
1-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
CIN · top performer

TJ Friedl
CF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .226 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .261 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .243 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .238 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .245 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .248 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .223 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .300 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .217 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .264 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .140 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 30 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 72 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 122 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .259 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .270 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .267 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .238 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .264 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .356 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .239 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .243 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 81 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 16 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 112 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
10
1
Runs
2
1
Errors
0
Current series
CIN wins series 4-2
Season series
CIN wins series 7-6
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 12pp · Bottom 5th Inning
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
B. Ashcraft
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 8 H · 1 BB
T. Friedl
CFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS
N. Lodolo
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.1 IP · 12 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CIN beat PIT 2-1.
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMarte · singled to center, Friedl scored on error, Marte safe at second on throwing error by shortstop N. Gonzales.
Horwitz · doubled to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
1
Runs
2
3
Hits
10
1
Errors
0
4
TB
11
0
HR
0
1
BB
1
14
K
8
8
LOB
16
Win probability
CIN vs PIT
Period scoring
PIT won 1 · CIN won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Marte 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Yorke 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 469 plays
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
McCutchen flied out to right.
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
+3pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Andrew McCutchen
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Reynolds flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
+5pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Bryan Reynolds
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
N. Gonzales flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
+5pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Nick Gonzales
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pagán relieved Santillan
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Top of the 9th inning
PIT 1·CIN 2
End of the 8th inning
PIT 1·CIN 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Andujar grounded out to shortstop.
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Carmen Mlodzinski pitches to Miguel Andujar
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
De La Cruz grounded out to first.
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
−1pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
PIT 1·CIN 2
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 70 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.0%
ensemble · CIN favored
Elo Static
56.4%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.7%
P(CIN win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.1%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.28 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.