
DET
85-72

CLE
85-72
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CLE wins
DET 2 · CLE 5 (by 3)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CLE +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
leveland Guardians held off Detroit Tigers, 5–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Riley Greene
LF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CLE · top performer

Daniel Schneemann
CF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


DET
85-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 5-32 | 32 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
CLE
85-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-29 | 29 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
7
2
Runs
5
1
Errors
0
Current series
DET wins series 4-2
Season series
CLE leads series 7-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 15pp · Bottom 6th Inning
R. Greene
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
T. Skubal
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 8 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
D. Schneemann
CFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
G. Williams
SPStarting pitcher12-K game
6.0 IP · 12 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CLE beat DET 5-2.
Win probability
CLE vs DET
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactGreene · homered to right (367 feet).
Ram · írez reached on infield single to third, Kwan scored, Martínez to third.
Schneemann · singled to left, Hedges scored and Kwan scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
DET won 1 · CLE won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Greene 1
Ram 1
Inn 7
Schneemann 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 525 plays
·
DET 2·CLE 5
McKinstry lined out to third.
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Cade Smith pitches to Zach McKinstry
·
DET 2·CLE 5
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Dingler struck out looking.
·
DET 2·CLE 5
+0.9pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Looking
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Cade Smith pitches to Dillon Dingler
·
DET 2·CLE 5
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Greene struck out swinging.
·
DET 2·CLE 5
+2pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Cade Smith pitches to Riley Greene
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Smith relieved Gaddis
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Top of the 9th inning
DET 2·CLE 5
End of the 8th inning
DET 2·CLE 5
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Noel flied out to right.
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
Rafael Montero pitches to Jhonkensy Noel
· ·
DET 2·CLE 5
R. Montero relieved Hurter
·
DET 2·CLE 5
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
2
Runs
5
5
Hits
7
1
Errors
0
10
TB
9
1
HR
0
2
BB
4
19
K
10
10
LOB
9
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
1 of 16 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 73 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
60.8%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
60.1%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
59.1%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
60.5%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.59 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs