
MIA
77-80

PHI
92-65
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIA
league avg
PHI
.731
OPS
.720
.706
.325
OBP
.318
.305
4.37
Runs / G
4.50
4.39
3.99
Team ERA
4.18
4.17
1.24
WHIP
1.30
1.30
8.5
K / 9
8.5
▶9.9
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
MIA 6 · PHI 5 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| PHI | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Final play
“End of the 11th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
MIA · top performer

Liam Hicks
C
2-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
PHI · top performer

Nick Castellanos
RF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 42pp · Bottom 10th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .250 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .233 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .311 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .269 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .281 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .248 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .275 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .235 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .241 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .277 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 41 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 67 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 29 | |
| Team | 11.0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 175 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .325 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .241 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| .281 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .281 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .259 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .217 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .206 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .255 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .256 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .212 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 41 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 91 | |
| 0.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 23 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| Team | 11.0 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 170 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIA
PHI
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
9
6
Runs
5
1
Errors
2
Team stats
MIA
Away
Stat
PHI
Home
6
Runs
5
10
Hits
9
1
Errors
2
17
TB
17
2
HR
2
2
BB
3
11
K
9
15
LOB
20
Current series
PHI wins series 4-2
Season series
PHI leads series 7-4
How it ended
MIA beat PHI 6-5. L. Hicks led the way — 2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS. Castellanos's play in the bottom 10th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (42pp).
Last play
End of the 11th inning
Win probability
PHI vs MIA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHern · ández homered to left center (380 feet).
Castellanos · singled to left, Stubbs scored, Bohm to third.
Wilson · grounded out to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| PHI | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Period scoring
MIA won 3 · PHI won 2
Inn 1
Schwarber 1
Inn 2
Kemp 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Conine 1
Inn 9
Hern 1
Inn 10
Hicks 1
Bohm 1
Inn 11
Edwards 1
Play-by-play · 692 plays
End of the 11th inning
MIA 6·PHI 5
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Stott grounded out to pitcher.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
−16pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Josh Simpson pitches to Bryson Stott
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Wilson grounded out to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
−27pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Josh Simpson pitches to Weston Wilson
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Kepler grounded out to second, Marchán to third.
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Josh Simpson pitches to Max Kepler
·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Bottom of the 11th inning
MIA 6·PHI 5
Middle of the 11th inning
MIA 6·PHI 5
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Conine struck out swinging.
· ·
MIA 6·PHI 5
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins went into Philadelphia Phillies and beat them, 6–5. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 112 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
62.5%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
61.9%
P(PHI win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
63.2%
P(PHI win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
62.6%
P(PHI win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.53 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.