
BOS
41-48

CHW
47-43
Line movement
37 snapshots
CHW spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
CHW no-vig %
46.9%
open 46.9%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = CHW favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
BOS
league avg
CHW
.709
OPS
.720
▶.722
.315
OBP
.318
.316
4.24
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.75
3.53
Team ERA
4.18
4.03
1.23
WHIP
1.31
1.29
8.6
K / 9
8.5
8.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
BOS wins
BOS 8 · CHW 1 (by 7)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHW +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
BOS · top performer

Connor Wong
C
1-1
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
CHW · top performer

Sam Antonacci
LF
4-3
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 17pp · Top 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .298 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .284 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .261 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .287 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .292 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .220 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .201 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .228 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .294 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 8 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 91 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 142 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .245 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .281 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .221 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .265 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .291 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .205 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .218 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .291 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .239 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 92 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 19 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 37 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 176 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantBOS
CHW
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
4
8
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Team stats
BOS
Away
Stat
CHW
Home
8
Runs
1
11
Hits
4
0
Errors
0
20
TB
4
2
HR
0
7
BB
2
8
K
10
23
LOB
13
Current series
BOS wins series 3-0
Season series
BOS leads series 1-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
BOS -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
How it ended
BOS beat CHW 8-1. C. Wong led the way — 1-for-1 · 2 R · 2.000 OPS.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMonasterio · homered to left (375 feet).
Rafaela · homered to left (383 feet), Wong scored.
Perez · reached on infield single to first, Antonacci to second, Meidroth to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Betting line
BOS -1.5·O/U 8.5·BOS -125/CHW +104
Recap · MLB
oston Red Sox went into Chicago White Sox and beat them, 8–1. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
BOS -1.5 cashed (won by 7). Total cleared the 8.5 OVER by 0.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Line movement · 37 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
Win probability
CHW vs BOS
Period scoring
BOS won 3 · CHW won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Rafaela 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Wong 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Teel 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Contreras 2
Play-by-play · 610 plays
End of the 9th inning
BOS 8·CHW 1
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Perez struck out swinging.
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Ryan Watson pitches to Junior Perez
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Antonacci struck out looking.
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Ryan Watson pitches to Sam Antonacci
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Meidroth flied out to left.
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Ryan Watson pitches to Chase Meidroth
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Watson relieved Whitlock
·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
BOS 8·CHW 1
Middle of the 9th inning
BOS 8·CHW 1
· ·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Monasterio struck out swinging.
· ·
BOS 8·CHW 1
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+104
Close price
+104
Open no-vig
46.9%
Close no-vig
46.9%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
How we read this game
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 108 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.4%
ensemble · CHW favored
Elo Static
53.5%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
50.5%
P(CHW win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
53.2%
P(CHW win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.34 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
91% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.