
CHC
75-55

LAA
61-68
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHC
league avg
LAA
.753
OPS
.719
.693
.338
OBP
.318
.312
5.10
Runs / G
4.50
4.15
4.07
Team ERA
4.18
4.46
1.25
WHIP
1.30
1.36
7.8
K / 9
8.5
▶9.1
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 12 · LAA 1 (by 11)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
CHC · top performer

Reese McGuire
C
2-1
AB-H
2
R
5
RBI
LAA · top performer

Niko Kavadas
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 18pp · Top 3rd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .263 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .262 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| .243 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .256 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .227 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .289 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .188 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .248 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .223 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .226 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .263 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .218 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 39 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 74 | |
| 3.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 44 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 118 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .264 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .266 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .237 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .231 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .249 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .226 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .224 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .143 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .200 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .184 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 68 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 1.1 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 140 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
LAA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
14
Hits
5
12
Runs
1
0
Errors
1
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
LAA
Home
12
Runs
1
14
Hits
5
0
Errors
1
27
TB
8
3
HR
1
3
BB
1
6
K
10
15
LOB
9
Current series
CHC win series 3-0
Season series
CHC lead series 2-0
How it ended
CHC beat LAA 12-1. R. McGuire led the way — 1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.667 OPS. Tucker's play in the top 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
LAA vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactTucker · homered to right (399 feet), Busch scored.
McGuire · homered to center (389 feet), Happ scored, Hoerner scored and Swanson scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
CHC won 4 · LAA won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Tucker 2
Inn 4
McGuire 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Tucker 3
Inn 7
Swanson 1
Adell 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 543 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 12·LAA 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Adell flied out to center.
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Ben Brown pitches to Jo Adell
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Moncada grounded out to first.
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Ben Brown pitches to Yoan Moncada
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Ward grounded out to shortstop.
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Ben Brown pitches to Taylor Ward
·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHC 12·LAA 1
Middle of the 9th inning
CHC 12·LAA 1
· ·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Swanson grounded into double play, third to second to first, Castro out at second.
· ·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 12·LAA 1
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Los Angeles Angels and beat them, 12–1. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
120
projections · 102 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
36.0%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
44.0%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
39.5%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
42.0%
P(LAA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.83 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
88% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.