
CLE
51-46

MIA
52-45
Line movement
200 snapshots
MIA spread
+1.5
open PK · +1.5
Total
O/U 7.5
open O/U 8.0 · -0.5
MIA no-vig %
49.0%
open 50.4% · -1.4
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CLE
league avg
MIA
.680
OPS
.719
▶.732
.310
OBP
.318
▶.325
3.95
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.39
3.76
Team ERA
4.18
4.00
1.26
WHIP
1.30
▶1.24
9.4
K / 9
8.5
8.5
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CLE wins
CLE 5 · MIA 2 (by 3)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CLE +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+12.5pp
best edge · MIA · DraftKings
CLE
no live price
MIA
★ bestedge +12.5pp · implied 33.4%
| Book | CLE | MIA | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -243 | +181★ | +12.5 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
On the call · MLB
4 officials
Home Plate Umpire
Chad Fairchild
First Base Umpire
Bill Miller
Second Base Umpire
Brian Walsh
Third Base Umpire
Chad Whitson
Per-official season stats (foul rate, strike-zone tendency) activate with the season-stats rollup. Bookmark the names for now.
The receipts
+1.42
CLV pp
Open price
-108
Close price
-114
Open no-vig
49.6%
Close no-vig
51.0%
Market came to the model · Graded: hit
How we read this game
CLE · top performer

Brayan Rocchio
SS
5-2
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MIA · top performer

Griffin Conine
RF
2-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 13pp · Top 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .238 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .276 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .278 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .215 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .221 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .239 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .180 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .219 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 36 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 85 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 16 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 140 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .334 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| .236 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .290 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .303 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .272 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .215 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .240 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .182 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .239 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .197 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .266 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .245 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 34 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 163 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCLE
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
8
5
Runs
2
0
Errors
1
Team stats
CLE
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
5
Runs
2
11
Hits
8
0
Errors
1
17
TB
12
2
HR
1
3
BB
2
6
K
14
20
LOB
16
Current series
CLE wins series 3-0
Season series
CLE wins series 3-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CLE -1.5
Total
7.5
Defensive · -1.0 vs avg
Moneyline
9· 6h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
How it ended
CLE beat MIA 5-2. B. Rocchio led the way — 2-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.400 OPS.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactRocchio · singled to right, Bazzana scored, Rocchio to second.
Edwards · singled to left, Hernández scored.
Rocchio · homered to right (398 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Betting line
CLE -1.5·O/U 7.5·CLE -114/MIA -105
Recap · MLB
leveland Guardians went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 5–2.
CLE -1.5 cashed (won by 3). Total stayed UNDER 7.5 by 0.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
+1.5 since open
Total
7.5
-0.5 since open
Win probability
MIA vs CLE
Period scoring
CLE won 3 · MIA won 1
Inn 1
Rocchio 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Edwards 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Rocchio 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Watson 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
DeLauter 1
Conine 1
Play-by-play · 604 plays
End of the 9th inning
CLE 5·MIA 2
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Lopez struck out looking. Miami Marlins challenged: call on the field was upheld.
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
−1pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Mack to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Mack to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Cade Smith pitches to Otto Lopez
· ·
CLE 5·MIA 2
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Mack singled to right.
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
+0.9pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Cade Smith pitches to Joe Mack
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Conine homered to right center (442 feet).
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Cade Smith pitches to Griffin Conine
·
CLE 5·MIA 2
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Marsee flied out to left.
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Cade Smith pitches to Jakob Marsee
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
Stowers struck out swinging.
·
CLE 5·MIA 1
−1pp
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
133
projections · 118 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
46.3%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
47.5%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.9%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.6%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.17 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.