
HOU
46-49

WSH
48-46
Line movement
46 snapshots
WSH spread
-1.5
open -1.5
Total
O/U 10.0
open O/U 10.0
WSH no-vig %
54.0%
open 54.0%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = WSH favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
HOU
league avg
WSH
.735
OPS
.720
▶.772
.319
OBP
.318
▶.328
4.65
Runs / G
4.50
▶5.40
4.66
Team ERA
4.18
4.78
1.38
WHIP
1.31
1.40
8.9
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
WSH wins
HOU 2 · WSH 8 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked HOU +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| WSH | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+108
Close price
+108
Open no-vig
46.0%
Close no-vig
46.0%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
How we read this game
HOU · top performer
Zach Dezenzo
UN
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
WSH · top performer

Luis Garcia Jr.
1B
4-3
AB-H
2
R
3
RBI
Biggest swing: 14pp · Bottom 4th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .231 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .310 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .253 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .242 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .220 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .242 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .222 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .244 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 34 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 94 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 38 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 180 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .269 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| .291 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .240 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .276 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .252 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .226 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .249 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .280 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 3 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 99 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 137 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantHOU
WSH
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
9
2
Runs
8
0
Errors
1
Team stats
HOU
Away
Stat
WSH
Home
2
Runs
8
8
Hits
9
0
Errors
1
11
TB
17
0
HR
2
0
BB
10
10
K
3
14
LOB
28
Current series
WSH wins series 2-1
Season series
WSH wins series 2-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
WSH -1.5
Total
10.0
High-scoring · +1.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 46 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
10.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
WSH beat HOU 8-2. L. Garcia Jr. led the way — 3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.300 OPS.
Win probability
WSH vs HOU
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactLile · doubled to left, García Jr. scored.
Garc · ía Jr. homered to right center (417 feet), Ruiz scored and Wood scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| WSH | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
HOU won 1 · WSH won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Abrams 1
Inn 4
Garc 3
Inn 5
Matthews 1
Abrams 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Allen 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 597 plays
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Matthews grounded out to shortstop.
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Justin Lawrence pitches to Brice Matthews
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Diaz grounded out to second, Walker to third.
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Justin Lawrence pitches to Yainer Diaz
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Smith grounded out to third.
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Justin Lawrence pitches to Cam Smith
· ·
HOU 2·WSH 8
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Walker doubled to right.
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Justin Lawrence pitches to Christian Walker
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Lawrence relieved Ribalta
·
HOU 2·WSH 8
Betting line
WSH -1.5·O/U 10·HOU +108/WSH -130
Recap · MLB
ashington Nationals held off Houston Astros, 8–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
WSH -1.5 cashed (won by 6). Total pushed exactly on 10.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 93 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
48.4%
ensemble · HOU favored
Elo Static
48.8%
P(WSH win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
50.6%
P(WSH win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.2%
P(WSH win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.77 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.