
MIL
58-34

STL
48-43
Line movement
50 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
STL no-vig %
42.7%
open 42.7%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIL
league avg
STL
.737
OPS
.720
.691
.337
OBP
.318
.314
5.05
Runs / G
4.50
4.31
3.48
Team ERA
4.18
4.17
1.17
WHIP
1.31
1.35
9.8
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
MIL 1 · STL 5 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked STL +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| STL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+124
Close price
+124
Open no-vig
42.7%
Close no-vig
42.7%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
How we read this game
MIL · top performer

Cooper Pratt
SS
3-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
STL · top performer

Alec Burleson
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
Biggest swing: 13pp · Bottom 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .242 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .282 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .265 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .284 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .276 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .226 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .087 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .329 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 70 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 26 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 135 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .250 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .251 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .294 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .255 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .277 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .270 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .229 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .263 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .214 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .246 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 90 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 133 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIL
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
7
1
Runs
5
1
Errors
0
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
STL
Home
1
Runs
5
7
Hits
7
1
Errors
0
9
TB
16
0
HR
2
2
BB
0
9
K
7
12
LOB
6
Current series
MIL wins series 4-1
Season series
MIL leads series 7-2
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIL -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 50 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
STL beat MIL 5-1. A. Burleson led the way — 2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS.
Win probability
STL vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWinn · doubled to right.
Burleson · doubled to right, Walker scored.
Ferm · ín homered to left center (404 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| STL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
MIL won 1 · STL won 3
Inn 1
Walker 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Ferm 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Burleson 2
Inn 7
Pratt 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 517 plays
· ·
MIL 1·STL 5
Frelick grounded out to second.
· ·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pratt to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pratt to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 1·STL 5
Riley O'Brien pitches to Sal Frelick
· ·
MIL 1·STL 5
Frelick hit for Ortiz
·
MIL 1·STL 5
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pratt singled to left.
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Riley O'Brien pitches to Cooper Pratt
·
MIL 1·STL 5
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Lara grounded out to second.
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Riley O'Brien pitches to Luis Lara
·
MIL 1·STL 5
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Mitchell struck out looking.
·
MIL 1·STL 5
+0.8pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Looking
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Riley O'Brien pitches to Garrett Mitchell
·
MIL 1·STL 5
Betting line
MIL -1.5·O/U 8.5·MIL -149/STL +124
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals held off Milwaukee Brewers, 5–1.
STL +1.5 cashed (MIL lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 8.5 by 2.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 113 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.9%
ensemble · STL favored
Elo Static
53.6%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.0%
P(STL win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
52.1%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.62 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.