
SEA
47-46

MIA
51-42
Line movement
34 snapshots
MIA spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 9.0
open O/U 9.0
MIA no-vig %
46.7%
open 46.7%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
SEA
league avg
MIA
.687
OPS
.720
▶.734
.309
OBP
.318
▶.326
3.99
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.41
3.74
Team ERA
4.18
4.03
1.18
WHIP
1.31
1.25
8.7
K / 9
8.5
8.6
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
SEA 0 · MIA 2 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+105
Close price
+105
Open no-vig
46.7%
Close no-vig
46.7%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
How we read this game
SEA · top performer

Josh Naylor
1B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MIA · top performer

Kyle Stowers
1B
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 12pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .213 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .286 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .266 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .170 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .251 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .230 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .254 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .230 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .203 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 31 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 86 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 101 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .288 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .345 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .303 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .244 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .239 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .194 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .243 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .278 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .235 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 30 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 71 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 26 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 125 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSEA
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
8
0
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Team stats
SEA
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
0
Runs
2
5
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
5
TB
16
0
HR
1
2
BB
0
9
K
7
13
LOB
7
Current series
MIA wins series 3-0
Season series
MIA leads series 2-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
SEA -1.5
Total
9.0
High-scoring · +0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 34 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
9.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIA beat SEA 2-0. K. Stowers led the way — 1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS.
Win probability
MIA vs SEA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactYoung · grounded into double play, second to shortstop to first, Raley out at second.
Stowers · homered to center (416 feet).
Edwards · tripled to right, Lopez scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
Period scoring
SEA won 0 · MIA won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Stowers 1
Inn 3
Edwards 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 462 plays
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Young struck out looking.
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
+3pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Naylor to third on wild pitch by Fairbanks.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Naylor to third on wild pitch by Fairbanks.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Naylor to second on fielder's indifference.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Naylor to second on fielder's indifference.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Cole Young
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Raley struck out swinging.
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
+5pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Luke Raley
· ·
SEA 0·MIA 2
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Naylor singled to left.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
−4pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Josh Naylor
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Raleigh flied out to right.
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
+3pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Cal Raleigh
·
SEA 0·MIA 2
Betting line
SEA -1.5·O/U 9·SEA -126/MIA +105
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Seattle Mariners, 2–0.
MIA +1.5 cashed (SEA lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 9.0 by 7.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 110 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
60.9%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
60.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
60.8%
P(MIA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.1%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.38 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.