
TOR
44-49

SF
38-54
Line movement
43 snapshots
SF spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 7.0
open O/U 7.0
SF no-vig %
46.9%
open 46.9%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = SF favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
TOR
league avg
SF
.684
OPS
.720
▶.725
.305
OBP
.318
▶.310
3.95
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.20
4.09
Team ERA
4.18
4.38
1.31
WHIP
1.31
1.35
9.0
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TOR wins
TOR 10 · SF 0 (by 10)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked SF +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+104
Close price
+104
Open no-vig
46.9%
Close no-vig
46.9%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
How we read this game
TOR · top performer

George Springer
DH
4-1
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
SF · top performer

Heliot Ramos
LF
4-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 22pp · Top 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .297 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .289 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .262 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .222 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .246 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .237 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .185 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .250 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .229 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 40 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 118 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 122 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .278 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .324 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .275 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .244 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .308 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .229 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .269 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .240 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .162 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .167 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 106 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 31 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 28 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 165 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantTOR
SF
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
1
10
Runs
0
0
Errors
3
Team stats
TOR
Away
Stat
SF
Home
10
Runs
0
11
Hits
1
0
Errors
3
20
TB
1
3
HR
0
4
BB
3
3
K
11
14
LOB
9
Current series
TOR wins series 2-1
Season series
TOR wins series 2-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
TOR -1.5
Total
7.0
Defensive · -1.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 43 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
7.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
TOR beat SF 10-0. G. Springer led the way — 1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.400 OPS. Okamoto's play in the top 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (22pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SF vs TOR
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactVarsho · singled to right, Clement scored, Springer to second, Lukes to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period scoring
TOR won 3 · SF won 0
Inn 1
Okamoto 4
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Straw 1
Inn 9
Jr. 2
Play-by-play · 556 plays
End of the 9th inning
TOR 10·SF 0
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Devers popped out to first.
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Tyler Rogers pitches to Rafael Devers
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Schmitt flied out to center.
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Tyler Rogers pitches to Casey Schmitt
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Arraez flied out to center.
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Tyler Rogers pitches to Luis Arraez
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Rogers relieved Cease
·
TOR 10·SF 0
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Ramos singled to center.
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Dylan Cease pitches to Heliot Ramos
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Bottom of the 9th inning
TOR 10·SF 0
Middle of the 9th inning
TOR 10·SF 0
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Straw grounded into fielder's choice to shortstop, Kirk out at second.
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
Ryan Walker pitches to Myles Straw
· ·
TOR 10·SF 0
·
TOR 10·SF 0
Betting line
TOR -1.5·O/U 7·TOR -125/SF +104
Recap · MLB
oronto Blue Jays went into San Francisco Giants and beat them, 10–0. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
TOR -1.5 cashed (won by 10). Total cleared the 7.0 OVER by 3.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 97 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
59.5%
ensemble · SF favored
Elo Static
59.7%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
57.9%
P(SF win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
59.9%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.89 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.