
PIT
33-18-15

UTA
34-27-6
Historical comparables
Games like this · top 6 from 998 candidates
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year
Recap · NHL
ittsburgh Penguins went into Utah Mammoth and beat them, 4–3.
PIT +1.5 cashed (UTA lost outright). Total cleared the 6.5 OVER by 0.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Egor Chinakhov
RW · #59
0
G
2
A
—
SOG
UTA · top performer

Dylan Guenther
RW · #11
2
G
0
A
—
SOG
NHL · Pittsburgh Penguins at Utah Mammoth · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


PIT
33-18-15
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
UTA
34-27-6
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
PIM
12
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
6.5
Defensive · -2.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 8 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
6.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
PIT beat UTA 4-3.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| UTA | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Period scoring
PIT won 2 · UTA won 1
1
2
3
Play-by-play · 319 plays
- 3rd·20:00
Game End
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:58
Mikhail Sergachev shot blocked by Parker Wotherspoon
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:49
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Blake Lizotte
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:49
Goalie Stopped
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:49
Nick Schmaltz Snap Shot saved by Stuart Skinner
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:43
Mikhail Sergachev shot blocked by Connor Dewar
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:38
Clayton Keller shot blocked by Bryan Rust
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:32
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Noel Acciari
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:32
Icing
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:25
Barrett Hayton Tip-In saved by Stuart Skinner
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:17
Dylan Guenther Slap Shot High and Wide Left
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:53
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Noel Acciari
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:53
Goalie Stopped
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:52
Dylan Guenther Slap Shot saved by Stuart Skinner
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:49
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Blake Lizotte
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:49
Goalie Stopped
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:48
Kevin Stenlund Tip-In saved by Stuart Skinner
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:35
Blake Lizotte faceoff won against Kevin Stenlund
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:35
Timeout - Home
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:35
Goalie Stopped
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:33
Dylan Guenther Snap Shot Above Crossbar
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:29
Barrett Hayton Wrist Shot Wide Right
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:44
Giveaway by Ryan Shea
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:40
Noel Acciari faceoff won against Barrett Hayton
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:40
Icing
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:33
Blake Lizotte faceoff won against Nick Schmaltz
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:33
Puck in Netting
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:30
Michael Carcone Snap Shot saved by Stuart Skinner
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:24
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Thomas Novak
·
PIT 4·UTA 3
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
UTA
Home
23
Shots
29
33.3
PCT
33.3
6
PIM
12
26
Faceoffs W
33
17
Blocks
8
19
Giveaways
12
1
Takeaways
7
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 6.5·PIT +130/UTA -155
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 skaters with EDGE
Egor ChinakhovPIT · RWSHOT MPH94.799
Erik KarlssonPIT · DSKATE MPH22.897
Ben KindelPIT · CSHOT MPH87.584
Blake LizottePIT · CBURSTS2483
Kris LetangPIT · DSHOT MPH91.775
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.1%
ensemble · UTA favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.