
CHI
25-29-11

UTA
34-26-6
Historical comparables
Games like this · top 6 from 998 candidates
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year
Recap · NHL
hicago Blackhawks went into Utah Mammoth and beat them, 3–2 in overtime.
CHI +1.5 cashed (UTA lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 5.5 by 0.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHI · top performer

Connor Bedard
C · #98
1
G
1
A
—
SOG
UTA · top performer

Michael Carcone
LW · #53
0
G
1
A
—
SOG
NHL · Chicago Blackhawks at Utah Mammoth · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


CHI
25-29-11
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
UTA
34-26-6
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
PIM
4
Season series
CHI wins series 4-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
5.5
Defensive · -3.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 7 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
5.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
CHI beat UTA 3-2.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | OT | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| UTA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
CHI won 2 · UTA won 1
1
2
3
OT
Play-by-play · 313 plays
- OT·3:57
Game End
CHI 3·UTA 2
- OT·3:57
End of OT
CHI 3·UTA 2
- OT·3:57
Connor Bedard Goal (27) Snap Shot, assists: Alex Vlasic (15), Nick Lardis (3)
· ·
CHI 3·UTA 2
- OT·3:54
Alex Vlasic Snap Shot saved by Karel Vejmelka
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·3:44
Nick Schmaltz Backhand saved by Spencer Knight
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·3:26
Dylan Guenther Snap Shot saved by Spencer Knight
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·3:10
Matt Grzelcyk hit Clayton Keller
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·3:08
Clayton Keller Backhand Wide Right
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·2:57
Clayton Keller Wrist Shot saved by Spencer Knight
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·2:24
Jack McBain faceoff won against Connor Bedard
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·2:24
Puck in Netting
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·2:22
Ryan Greene Snap Shot saved by Karel Vejmelka
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:58
MacKenzie Weegar Snap Shot saved by Spencer Knight
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:52
Takeaway by Lawson Crouse
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:34
Mikhail Sergachev Backhand saved by Spencer Knight
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:25
Connor Bedard Snap Shot Above Crossbar
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:00
Frank Nazar faceoff won against Kevin Stenlund
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- OT·0:00
Start of Overtime
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·19:20
Matt Grzelcyk Wrist Shot saved by Karel Vejmelka
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·18:34
Jack McBain shot blocked by Louis Crevier
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·18:20
Takeaway by Frank Nazar
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·18:12
Lawson Crouse hit Frank Nazar
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:42
Landon Slaggert hit MacKenzie Weegar
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:40
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Connor Bedard
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:40
Puck Frozen - Goalie
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:26
Connor Bedard faceoff won against Nick Schmaltz
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:26
Off-side
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·17:04
Kailer Yamamoto hit Alex Vlasic
·
CHI 2·UTA 2
- 3rd·16:59
Giveaway by Mikhail Sergachev
CHI 2·UTA 2
Team stats
CHI
Away
Stat
UTA
Home
23
Shots
31
100.0
PCT
0.0
4
PIM
4
21
Faceoffs W
28
17
Blocks
11
13
Giveaways
12
8
Takeaways
8
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 5.5·CHI +190/UTA -230
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 skaters with EDGE
Louis CrevierCHI · DSHOT MPH102.899
Connor BedardCHI · CBURSTS19595
Alex VlasicCHI · DBURSTS7190
Ryan DonatoCHI · CSHOT MPH91.388
Wyatt KaiserCHI · DBURSTS6587
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.1%
ensemble · UTA favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.