
CHC
61-46

STL
53-54
Line movement
200 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 9.0
open O/U 9.0
STL no-vig %
48.9%
open 48.9%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHC
league avg
STL
.754
OPS
.720
.694
.339
OBP
.318
.315
5.13
Runs / G
4.50
4.35
4.06
Team ERA
4.18
4.15
1.25
WHIP
1.30
1.34
7.8
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 10 · STL 2 (by 8)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
On the call · MLB
4 officials
Home Plate Umpire
Adam Hamari
First Base Umpire
Todd Tichenor
Second Base Umpire
Tyler Jones
Third Base Umpire
Clint Vondrak
Per-official season stats (foul rate, strike-zone tendency) activate with the season-stats rollup. Bookmark the names for now.
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+8.6pp
best edge · CHC · DraftKings
CHC
★ bestedge +8.6pp · implied 52.8%
STL
no live price
| Book | CHC | STL | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -128★ | -101 | +8.6 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
The receipts
-0.65
CLV pp
Open price
-115
Close price
-112
Open no-vig
51.1%
Close no-vig
50.4%
Market faded the model · Graded: hit
How we read this game
CHC · top performer

Justin Dean
CF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
STL · top performer

Bryan Torres
LF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 18pp · Top 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .285 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .272 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .244 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .245 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .221 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .254 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .244 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .260 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .322 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .500 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .375 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 42 | 10 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 94 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 27 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 135 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .254 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .283 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .283 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .242 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .243 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .244 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .226 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .247 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .173 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .231 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .229 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .214 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63 | |
| 2.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 38 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 36 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 30 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 21 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 188 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
17
Hits
7
10
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
STL
Home
10
Runs
2
17
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
22
TB
8
0
HR
0
3
BB
3
10
K
2
21
LOB
14
Current series
CHC win series 3-1
Season series
Series tied 4-4
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHC -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
CHC beat STL 10-2. J. Dean led the way — 1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS. Happ's play in the top 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
STL vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHapp · doubled to right, Bregman scored and Suzuki scored.
Suzuki · doubled to left, Kelly scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Period scoring
CHC won 4 · STL won 1
Inn 1
Happ 2
Inn 2
Hoerner 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Church 1
Inn 5
Ramirez 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Suzuki 1
Inn 9
Kelly 1
Winn 1
Play-by-play · 625 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 10·STL 2
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Crooks grounded out to third.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Andrew Wantz pitches to Jimmy Crooks
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Fermín flied out to center.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Andrew Wantz pitches to Jose Fermin
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Church lined out to center.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Andrew Wantz pitches to Nathan Church
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
·
CHC 10·STL 2
Winn hit a ground rule double, Nootbaar scored.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Nootbaar to second on passed ball by Kelly.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Nootbaar to second on passed ball by Kelly.
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
Andrew Wantz pitches to Masyn Winn
· ·
CHC 10·STL 2
·
CHC 10·STL 1
Nootbaar walked.
·
CHC 10·STL 1
Betting line
CHC -1.5·O/U 8.5·CHC -108/STL -112
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into St. Louis Cardinals and beat them, 10–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
CHC -1.5 cashed (won by 8). Total cleared the 8.5 OVER by 3.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 110 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
38.3%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
43.2%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
44.4%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
41.8%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.06 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.