
PHI
23-17-9

UTA
26-20-4
Historical comparables
Games like this · top 6 from 998 candidates
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year
Recap · NHL
tah Mammoth held off Philadelphia Flyers, 5–4 in overtime.
PHI +1.5 cashed (UTA won by 1). Total cleared the 5.5 OVER by 3.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Christian Dvorak
C · #22
2
G
1
A
—
SOG
UTA · top performer

Clayton Keller
RW · #9
2
G
1
A
—
SOG
NHL · Philadelphia Flyers at Utah Mammoth · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


PHI
23-17-9
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
UTA
26-20-4
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
PIM
17
Season series
UTA leads series 1-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
5.5
Defensive · -3.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 8 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
5.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
UTA beat PHI 5-4.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | OT | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| UTA | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Period scoring
PHI won 1 · UTA won 2
1
2
3
OT
Play-by-play · 348 plays
- OT·2:01
Game End
PHI 4·UTA 5
- OT·2:01
End of OT
PHI 4·UTA 5
- OT·2:01
Clayton Keller Goal (15) Snap Shot, assists: Dylan Guenther (19)
·
PHI 4·UTA 5
- OT·1:45
Giveaway by Mikhail Sergachev
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·1:19
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Christian Dvorak
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·1:19
Icing
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·1:11
Nick Schmaltz Wrist Shot Wide Right
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·0:40
Jack McBain faceoff won against Christian Dvorak
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·0:40
Icing
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·0:00
Christian Dvorak faceoff won against Kevin Stenlund
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- OT·0:00
Start of Overtime
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·19:53
Nate Schmidt Slap Shot Wide Right
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·19:46
Kevin Stenlund Snap Shot Wide Left
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·19:25
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Noah Cates
·
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·19:25
Clayton Keller Goal (14) Backhand, assists: none
PHI 4·UTA 4
- 3rd·19:17
Lawson Crouse hit Travis Konecny
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:07
Travis Konecny shot blocked by Jack McBain
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:58
Dylan Guenther shot blocked by Cam York
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:55
Jack McBain faceoff won against Sean Couturier
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:55
Timeout - Home
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:55
Off-side
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:44
Nick Seeler shot blocked by Clayton Keller
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:41
Giveaway by Dylan Guenther
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:33
Brandon Tanev Snap Shot saved by Samuel Ersson
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:23
Noah Cates Tip-In Wide Right
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:20
Noah Cates faceoff won against Barrett Hayton
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:20
Goalie Stopped
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:18
Bobby Brink Backhand saved by Karel Vejmelka
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:16
Barrett Hayton hit Trevor Zegras
·
PHI 4·UTA 3
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
UTA
Home
29
Shots
27
33.3
PCT
33.3
11
PIM
17
34
Faceoffs W
26
18
Blocks
11
20
Giveaways
13
5
Takeaways
3
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 5.5·PHI +150/UTA -180
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 skaters with EDGE
Jamie DrysdalePHI · DSKATE MPH23.098
Travis SanheimPHI · DSKATE MPH22.795
Cam YorkPHI · DSKATE MPH22.693
Christian DvorakPHI · CBURSTS3492
Denver BarkeyPHI · CBURSTS2178
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.1%
ensemble · UTA favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.