
MIL
59-34

STL
48-44
Line movement
53 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
STL no-vig %
46.8%
open 46.8%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIL
league avg
STL
.736
OPS
.719
.689
.337
OBP
.318
.314
5.00
Runs / G
4.50
4.31
3.48
Team ERA
4.18
4.14
1.16
WHIP
1.30
1.34
9.8
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
MIL 8 · STL 4 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked STL +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Team pages
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
MIL · top performer

Jake Bauers
1B
4-2
AB-H
2
R
3
RBI
STL · top performer

JJ Wetherholt
2B
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 11pp · Bottom 6th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .274 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .284 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .269 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .281 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .268 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| .319 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .258 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .223 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 37 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 76 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 142 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .249 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .278 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .294 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .263 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .247 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .197 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .265 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .241 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 32 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 97 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 35 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 165 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIL
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
5
8
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
STL
Home
8
Runs
4
11
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
18
TB
10
2
HR
1
3
BB
3
8
K
7
17
LOB
13
Current series
MIL wins series 4-1
Season series
MIL leads series 8-2
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIL -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 53 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIL beat STL 8-4. J. Bauers led the way — 2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
STL vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWetherholt · doubled to right.
Walker · homered to left (406 feet), Wetherholt scored and Burleson scored.
Herrera · walked, Wetherholt to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Period scoring
MIL won 4 · STL won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Frelick 1
Inn 3
Bauers 3
Inn 4
Nootbaar 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Walker 3
Inn 7
Turang 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Contreras 1
Play-by-play · 587 plays
End of the 9th inning
MIL 8·STL 4
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Church grounded out to second.
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Fermín to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Fermín to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Nathan Church
· ·
MIL 8·STL 4
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Fermín walked.
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 4
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 2 : Automatic Ball - Pitch Timer Violation 2
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Jose Fermin
·
MIL 8·STL 4
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Torres lined out to left.
·
MIL 8·STL 4
−0.5pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Bryan Torres
·
MIL 8·STL 4
·
MIL 8·STL 4
Winn grounded out to shortstop.
·
MIL 8·STL 4
−0.9pp
Betting line
MIL -1.5·O/U 8.5·MIL -126/STL +104
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers went into St. Louis Cardinals and beat them, 8–4.
MIL -1.5 cashed (won by 4). Total cleared the 8.5 OVER by 3.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+104
Close price
+104
Open no-vig
46.8%
Close no-vig
46.8%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
How we read this game
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 113 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.2%
ensemble · STL favored
Elo Static
53.8%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
52.6%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
52.4%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.62 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.