
SEA
47-47

MIA
52-42
Line movement
41 snapshots
MIA spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.0
open O/U 8.0
MIA no-vig %
45.8%
open 45.8%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
SEA
league avg
MIA
.689
OPS
.719
▶.732
.310
OBP
.318
▶.325
4.02
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.39
3.75
Team ERA
4.18
4.00
1.19
WHIP
1.30
1.24
8.7
K / 9
8.5
8.5
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
SEA 4 · MIA 8 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MIA | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+109
Close price
+109
Open no-vig
45.8%
Close no-vig
45.8%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
How we read this game
Team pages
SEA · top performer

Randy Arozarena
LF
3-1
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Griffin Conine
RF
4-3
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 13pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .210 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .287 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| .269 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .168 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .251 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .235 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .252 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .220 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .206 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Team | 33 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 81 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 29 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 122 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .286 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .345 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .302 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .243 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .234 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .264 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .245 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .199 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .214 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .278 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 79 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 31 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 17 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 146 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSEA
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
12
4
Runs
8
2
Errors
2
Team stats
SEA
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
4
Runs
8
7
Hits
12
2
Errors
2
13
TB
19
2
HR
1
6
BB
5
9
K
4
18
LOB
20
Current series
MIA wins series 3-0
Season series
MIA wins series 3-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
SEA -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 41 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIA beat SEA 8-4. G. Conine led the way — 3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS.
Win probability
MIA vs SEA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactYoung · walked.
Conine · homered to right (373 feet).
Hicks · doubled to right, Marsee scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MIA | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
SEA won 2 · MIA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Young 1
Conine 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Lopez 2
Inn 5
Arozarena 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Marsee 1
Inn 8
Canzone 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 554 plays
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Canzone flied out to left.
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
+0.5pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Emerson to second on fielder's indifference.
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Emerson to second on fielder's indifference.
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Tyler Zuber pitches to Dominic Canzone
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Arozarena flied out to right.
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
+1pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Tyler Zuber pitches to Randy Arozarena
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Crawford struck out looking.
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
+2pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Tyler Zuber pitches to J.P. Crawford
· ·
SEA 4·MIA 8
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Emerson singled to center.
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
−2pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Tyler Zuber pitches to Colt Emerson
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Zuber relieved Faucher
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Top of the 9th inning
SEA 4·MIA 8
End of the 8th inning
SEA 4·MIA 8
·
SEA 4·MIA 8
Betting line
SEA -1.5·O/U 8·SEA -131/MIA +109
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Seattle Mariners, 8–4.
MIA +1.5 cashed (SEA lost outright). Total cleared the 8.0 OVER by 4.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
133
projections · 113 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
58.1%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
58.6%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.5%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
58.9%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.06 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.