
CHW
51-46

TOR
46-52
Line movement
200 snapshots
TOR spread
+1.5
open PK · +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
TOR no-vig %
49.1%
open 48.5% · +0.7
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = TOR favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
TOR
.724
OPS
.719
.682
.316
OBP
.318
.304
4.78
Runs / G
4.50
3.92
4.00
Team ERA
4.18
4.07
1.29
WHIP
1.30
1.31
8.6
K / 9
8.5
▶9.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TOR wins
CHW 0 · TOR 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHW +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 118 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
On the call · MLB
4 officials
Home Plate Umpire
Manny Gonzalez
First Base Umpire
Tom Hanahan
Second Base Umpire
Ron Kulpa
Third Base Umpire
Scott Barry
Per-official season stats (foul rate, strike-zone tendency) activate with the season-stats rollup. Bookmark the names for now.
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+21.6pp
best edge · CHW · DraftKings
CHW
★ bestedge +21.6pp · implied 49.2%
TOR
no live price
| Book | CHW | TOR | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -106★ | -113 | +21.6 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
The receipts
-1.30
CLV pp
Open price
-117
Close price
-111
Open no-vig
51.5%
Close no-vig
50.2%
Market faded the model · Graded: miss
How we read this game
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
CHW · top performer

Munetaka Murakami
1B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
TOR · top performer

Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
1B
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 18pp · Top 8th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .285 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .234 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .245 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .221 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| .242 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .194 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .232 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .297 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .272 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .242 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 85 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 108 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .295 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .282 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .265 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .219 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .204 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .233 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .316 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .225 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 80 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 114 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
TOR
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
5
0
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
TOR
Home
0
Runs
1
4
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
7
TB
7
0
HR
0
3
BB
3
10
K
6
13
LOB
12
Current series
CHW win series 2-1
Season series
CHW lead series 4-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHW -1.5
Total
9.0
High-scoring · +0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
3· 6.2h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
How it ended
TOR beat CHW 1-0. V. Guerrero Jr. led the way — 2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS. Antonacci's play in the top 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactVargas · grounded into double play, pitcher to second to first, Murakami out at second.
Benintendi · walked.
Antonacci · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
Betting line
CHW -1.5·O/U 9·CHW -106/TOR -113
Recap · MLB
oronto Blue Jays held off Chicago White Sox, 1–0. It came down to the final possession.
TOR +1.5 cashed (CHW lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 9.0 by 8.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
+1.5 since open
Total
9.0
0.0 since open
Win probability
TOR vs CHW
Period scoring
CHW won 0 · TOR won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Springer 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 466 plays
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Benintendi flied out to right.
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
+4pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Louis Varland pitches to Andrew Benintendi
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
C. Montgomery struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHW 0·TOR 1
+6pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Louis Varland pitches to Colson Montgomery
· ·
CHW 0·TOR 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Vargas grounded out to pitcher.BIG MOMENT
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
+7pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Louis Varland pitches to Miguel Vargas
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Varland relieved Rogers
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Top of the 9th inning
CHW 0·TOR 1
End of the 8th inning
CHW 0·TOR 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Okamoto popped out to catcher.
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Jordan Hicks pitches to Kazuma Okamoto
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Springer grounded out to second.
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
−1pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 0·TOR 1
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
27.9%
ensemble · CHW favored
Elo Static
37.5%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
35.0%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
37.6%
P(TOR win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.20 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
92% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.