
PIT
71-90

ATL
75-86
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
PIT 3 · ATL 1 (by 2)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked ATL +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ATL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates went into Atlanta Braves and beat them, 3–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Jack Suwinski
RF
3-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
ATL · top performer

Drake Baldwin
C
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PIT
71-90
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-35 | 35 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
ATL
75-86
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.614 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 5-32 | 32 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
ATL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
5
3
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 2-1
Season series
PIT leads series 4-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Top 6th Inning
J. Suwinski
RFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1.333 OPS
B. Chandler
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 4 H
D. Baldwin
CBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 R · 1.000 OPS
S. Strider
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 5 K · 3 ER · 8 H · 2 BB
How it ended
PIT beat ATL 3-1. N. Gonzales's play in the top 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
ATL vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactDavis · homered to left center (425 feet).
Suwinski · singled to right.
N. Gonzales · doubled to center, Horwitz scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ATL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
PIT won 2 · ATL won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Ozuna 1
Inn 3
Davis 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Gonzales 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 545 plays
End of the 9th inning
PIT 3·ATL 1
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Kim flied out to center.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
−5pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Dennis Santana pitches to Ha-Seong Kim
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Baldwin struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
−8pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Acuña Jr. stole second.
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Acuña Jr. stole second.
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Dennis Santana pitches to Drake Baldwin
· ·
PIT 3·ATL 1
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Acuña Jr. reached on infield single to second.BIG MOMENT
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
+7pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Dennis Santana pitches to Ronald Acuna Jr.
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
White struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
−5pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PIT 3·ATL 1
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
ATL
Home
3
Runs
1
10
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
14
TB
8
1
HR
0
4
BB
0
7
K
12
20
LOB
8
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 76 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
55.5%
ensemble · ATL favored
Elo Static
56.0%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.5%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.5%
P(ATL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.41 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.