
NYM
82-78

MIA
78-82
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
NYM 2 · MIA 6 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off New York Mets, 6–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
NYM · top performer

Francisco Lindor
SS
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Connor Norby
1B
2-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


NYM
82-78
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.29 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.428 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 6-33 | 33 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
MIA
78-82
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 3-3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| Team | 10-32 | 32 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantNYM
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
10
2
Runs
6
0
Errors
1
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
MIA leads series 6-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 23pp · Bottom 5th Inning
F. Lindor
SSBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
B. Sproat
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 2 K · 4 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
C. Norby
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.500 OPS
S. Alcantara
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
How it ended
MIA beat NYM 6-2. Hern's play in the bottom 5th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (23pp).
Win probability
MIA vs NYM
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHicks · grounded into double play, first to shortstop to pitcher, Edwards out at second.
Hern · ández tripled to right, Conine scored and Johnston scored.
Norby · homered to left (422 feet), Edwards scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 6 |
Period scoring
NYM won 1 · MIA won 1
Inn 1
Alonso 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Hern 2
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 526 plays
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Torrens grounded out to shortstop.
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Tyler Phillips pitches to Luis Torrens
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Mullins flied out to right.
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Tyler Phillips pitches to Cedric Mullins
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Alvarez grounded out to catcher.
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
+0.8pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Tyler Phillips pitches to Francisco Alvarez
·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Wiemer in right field.
NYM 2·MIA 6
Conine in left field.
NYM 2·MIA 6
Top of the 9th inning
NYM 2·MIA 6
End of the 8th inning
NYM 2·MIA 6
· ·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Hernández struck out swinging.
· ·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
NYM 2·MIA 6
Team stats
NYM
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
2
Runs
6
6
Hits
10
0
Errors
1
10
TB
16
1
HR
1
3
BB
1
4
K
6
17
LOB
10
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 15 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
121
projections · 73 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
54.3%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
54.9%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
54.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.1%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.79 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.