
ATL
62-77

CHC
80-59
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
ATL 3 · CHC 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs held off Atlanta Braves, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATL · top performer

Ozzie Albies
2B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CHC · top performer

Kyle Tucker
RF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


ATL
62-77
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.614 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT30.499+ | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-33 | 33 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
CHC
80-59
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-30 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATL
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
7
3
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
CHC lead series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
O. Albies
2BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
J. Wentz
RPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 8 K · 4 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
K. Tucker
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.333 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 2 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CHC beat ATL 4-3. Tucker's play in the bottom 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
CHC vs ATL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactTucker · homered to left center (381 feet), Alcántara scored and Hoerner scored.
White · homered to left center (409 feet).
White · flied out to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
ATL won 2 · CHC won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Tucker 3
Inn 4
Albies 2
Inn 5
White 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 528 plays
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
White flied out to center.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
+14pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Daniel Palencia pitches to Eli White
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Kim reached on infield single to second, Williams to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
−7pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Williams stole second.
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Williams stole second.
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Daniel Palencia pitches to Ha-Seong Kim
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Harris II flied out to left.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
+9pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Daniel Palencia pitches to Michael Harris II
· ·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Williams ran for Ozuna
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Ozuna singled to left.BIG MOMENT
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
−7pp
Pitch 8 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Daniel Palencia pitches to Marcell Ozuna
·
ATL 3·CHC 4
Team stats
ATL
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
3
Runs
4
8
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
16
TB
10
2
HR
1
1
BB
3
5
K
9
9
LOB
10
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.6%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
61.5%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
63.8%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
60.5%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.38 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
91% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.