
ATL
63-77

CHC
80-60
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
ATL
league avg
CHC
.744
OPS
.717
.722
.320
OBP
.319
▶.330
5.06
Runs / G
4.50
4.57
3.29
Team ERA
4.18
4.23
1.18
WHIP
1.31
1.25
8.8
K / 9
8.5
8.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATL wins
ATL 5 · CHC 1 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
tlanta Braves went into Chicago Cubs and beat them, 5–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATL · top performer

Luke Williams
SS
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
CHC · top performer

Ian Happ
LF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .275 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .268 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .240 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .280 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .228 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .249 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .375 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .240 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .133 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 33 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 101 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 138 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .288 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .259 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .244 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .238 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .000 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .247 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .159 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .231 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .220 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 30 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 75 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 33 | |
| 0.2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 156 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATL
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
4
5
Runs
1
1
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
CHC lead series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 50pp · Top 7th Inning
L. Williams
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
B. Elder
SPStarting pitcherGem
7.0 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 4 H
I. Happ
LFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 R · 0.833 OPS
C. Horton
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 1 BB
How it ended
ATL beat CHC 5-1. Kim's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (50pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CHC vs ATL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCastro · singled to right, Happ scored.
Albies · singled to right.
Kim · homered to left center (391 feet), Albies scored and M. Harris II scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
ATL won 2 · CHC won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Castro 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Kim 3
Inn 8
Albies 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 554 plays
End of the 9th inning
ATL 5·CHC 1
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Santana struck out looking.
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
−1pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Carlos Santana
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Happ walked.
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
+0.8pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Suzuki to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Suzuki to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Ian Happ
· ·
ATL 5·CHC 1
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Suzuki walked.
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 8 : Ball 4
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 7 : Ball 3
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 5·CHC 1
Team stats
ATL
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
5
Runs
1
6
Hits
4
1
Errors
0
12
TB
4
2
HR
0
3
BB
2
12
K
9
9
LOB
8
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
65.6%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
62.4%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
65.5%
P(CHC win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
63.2%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.30 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
91% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.