
MIL
56-33

STL
47-41
Line movement
36 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.0
open O/U 8.0
STL no-vig %
47.5%
open 47.5%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIL
league avg
STL
.737
OPS
.720
.691
.337
OBP
.318
.314
5.05
Runs / G
4.50
4.31
3.48
Team ERA
4.18
4.17
1.17
WHIP
1.31
1.35
9.8
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
MIL 4 · STL 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked STL +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
MIL · top performer

Garrett Mitchell
CF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
STL · top performer

Jose Fermin
LF
3-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 28pp · Top 7th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .239 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .292 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .268 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .291 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .265 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .269 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .242 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .204 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .240 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .209 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 85 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 120 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .266 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .290 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .277 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .273 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .253 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .255 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .234 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .218 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .270 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .281 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .231 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 33 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 81 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 23 | |
| 0.0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 25 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 157 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIL
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
7
4
Runs
3
1
Errors
2
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
STL
Home
4
Runs
3
8
Hits
7
1
Errors
2
10
TB
9
0
HR
0
3
BB
2
9
K
6
18
LOB
16
Current series
MIL wins series 4-1
Season series
MIL leads series 5-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIL -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 36 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIL beat STL 4-3. G. Mitchell led the way — 2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS. Hamilton's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (28pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
STL vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHamilton · doubled to right, Mitchell scored and Frelick scored, Pratt to third.
Turang · singled to left, Ortiz scored and Yelich scored, Chourio to second.
Winn · singled to left.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
MIL won 1 · STL won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Vel 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Winn 1
Inn 7
Hamilton 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 548 plays
End of the 9th inning
MIL 4·STL 3
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Torres struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
−8pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Trevor Megill pitches to Bryan Torres
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Torres hit for Pagés
·
MIL 4·STL 3
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Burleson struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
−11pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Trevor Megill pitches to Alec Burleson
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Burleson hit for Jordan
·
MIL 4·STL 3
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Church popped out to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
−11pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
Trevor Megill pitches to Nathan Church
· ·
MIL 4·STL 3
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Winn singled to left.BIG MOMENT
·
MIL 4·STL 3
+12pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Trevor Megill pitches to Masyn Winn
·
MIL 4·STL 3
Betting line
MIL -1.5·O/U 8·MIL -122/STL +101
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers went into St. Louis Cardinals and beat them, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
STL +1.5 cashed (MIL won by 1). Total stayed UNDER 8.0 by 1.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+101
Close price
+101
Open no-vig
47.5%
Close no-vig
47.5%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
How we read this game
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 113 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
54.4%
ensemble · STL favored
Elo Static
54.4%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.3%
P(STL win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
52.8%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.67 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.