
DET
87-75

CLE
88-74
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
DET
league avg
CLE
.706
OPS
.715
.689
.315
OBP
.319
.317
4.10
Runs / G
4.50
4.03
3.97
Team ERA
4.17
▶3.79
1.28
WHIP
1.31
▶1.26
8.2
K / 9
8.5
▶9.3
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
DET wins
DET 6 · CLE 3 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CLE +11pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
etroit Tigers went into Cleveland Guardians and beat them, 6–3.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Dillon Dingler
C
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CLE · top performer

Gabriel Arias
SS
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .154 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .400 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .077 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .182 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .364 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .100 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| .000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .455 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 36 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 74 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 140 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .167 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .286 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .091 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .167 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .125 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .167 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .222 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .333 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 47 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| 2.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 44 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 0.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 154 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
6
6
Runs
3
1
Errors
0
Playoff series
DET wins series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 20pp · Top 6th Inning
D. Dingler
CBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
J. Flaherty
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
G. Arias
SSBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.667 OPS
J. Cantillo
SPTop reliever
2.2 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
How it ended
DET beat CLE 6-3. Dingler's play in the top 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (20pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CLE vs DET
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCarpenter · doubled to second, Meadows scored, Torres to third.
Dingler · homered to center (401 feet).
Pérez singled to right, Báez scored and Meadows scored, Carpenter to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
DET won 3 · CLE won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Carpenter 1
Inn 4
Ram 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Dingler 1
Inn 7
Torkelson 1
Inn 8
Rocchio 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 570 plays
End of the 9th inning
DET 6·CLE 3
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Schneemann grounded out to first.
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Will Vest pitches to Daniel Schneemann
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Schneemann hit for Arias
·
DET 6·CLE 3
·
DET 6·CLE 3
DeLauter grounded out to pitcher.
·
DET 6·CLE 3
−1pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Will Vest pitches to Chase DeLauter
·
DET 6·CLE 3
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Manzardo grounded out to shortstop.
·
DET 6·CLE 3
−2pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Will Vest pitches to Kyle Manzardo
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Bottom of the 9th inning
DET 6·CLE 3
Middle of the 9th inning
DET 6·CLE 3
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Greene grounded out to third.
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Cade Smith pitches to Riley Greene
·
DET 6·CLE 3
·
DET 6·CLE 3
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
6
Runs
3
10
Hits
6
1
Errors
0
15
TB
8
1
HR
0
5
BB
2
9
K
6
20
LOB
7
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 95 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
61.4%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
60.8%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
60.4%
P(CLE win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
60.0%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.33 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.