
ATH
29-31

CHC
32-29
Line movement
200 snapshots
CHC spread
-1.5
open PK · -1.5
Total
O/U 7.5
open O/U 0.0 · +7.5
CHC no-vig %
53.1%
open 53.2%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = CHC favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATH wins
ATH 2 · CHC 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+3.9pp
best edge · CHC · DraftKings
ATH
no live price
CHC
★ bestedge +3.9pp · implied 54.3%
| Book | ATH | CHC | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +109 | -132★ | +3.9 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
-126
Close price
-126
Open no-vig
53.2%
Close no-vig
53.2%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
Recap · MLB
thletics went into Chicago Cubs and beat them, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ATH +1.5 cashed (CHC lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 7.5 by 4.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATH · top performer

Nick Kurtz
1B
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CHC · top performer

Nico Hoerner
2B
2-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


ATH
29-31
| Batting | Analytics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | |||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.4 | |
SPRINT26.632 | |||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.5 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.7 | |
SPRINT26.735 | |||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10.2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | |||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.6 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.6 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.1 | |
SPRINT28.891 | |||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| Team | 6-33 | 33 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
| Pitching | Analytics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | ||||||||
| 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 44.9 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.1 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.6 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | — |
CHC
32-29
| Batting | Analytics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | |||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25.9 | |
SPRINT28.278 | |||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.5 | |
SPRINT29.294 | |||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27.4 | |
SPRINT25.818 | |||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 33.0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | |||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26.8 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.7 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | |||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.4 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.4 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Team | 4-29 | 29 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | — |
| Pitching | Analytics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | ||||||||
| 6.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5.3 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7.8 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.7 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | — |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATH
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
4
2
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
ATH leads series 1-0
Season series
ATH leads series 1-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHC -1.5
1.5pt· 6.4h
Total
7.5
Defensive · -1.0 vs avg
7.5pt· 6.4h
Moneyline
1· 6.4h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Bottom 9th Inning
N. Kurtz
1BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
G. Jump
RPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 5 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 1 BB
N. Hoerner
2BBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1 R · 1.250 OPS
J. Taillon
SPStarting pitcher
6.1 IP · 6 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
How it ended
ATH beat CHC 2-1. Bregman's play in the bottom 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactKurtz · homered to left center (383 feet).
Gelof · singled to center, Rooker scored, Bolte to second.
Bregman · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Team stats
ATH
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
2
Runs
1
6
Hits
4
0
Errors
0
9
TB
4
1
HR
0
1
BB
2
8
K
6
10
LOB
12
Betting line
CHC -1.5·O/U 7.5·ATH +109/CHC -132
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
+1.5 since open
Total
7.5
+7.5 since open
Win probability
CHC vs ATH
Period scoring
ATH won 2 · CHC won 1
Inn 1
Bregman 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Kurtz 1
Inn 4
Gelof 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 499 plays
End of the 9th inning
ATH 2·CHC 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Happ flied out to center.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
−19pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Hogan Harris pitches to Ian Happ
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Harris relieved Barlow
·
ATH 2·CHC 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Suzuki flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
−18pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Seiya Suzuki
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Bregman struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
−19pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Alex Bregman
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Crow-Armstrong singled to right, Hoerner to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
+15pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Shea Langeliers challenged (pitch result), call on the field was confirmed: Nico Hoerner walks.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATH 2·CHC 1
+16pp
Pitch 7 : Ball 4
·
ATH 2·CHC 1
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATH 2·CHC 1
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
57.4%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
58.0%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.4%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.9%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.73 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.