
MIA
75-80

TEX
79-76
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIA
league avg
TEX
.706
OPS
.715
.700
.324
OBP
.319
.317
4.31
Runs / G
4.50
4.00
4.11
Team ERA
4.17
▶3.71
1.25
WHIP
1.31
▶1.23
8.8
K / 9
8.5
8.5
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
MIA 4 · TEX 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TEX +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| TEX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins went into Texas Rangers and beat them, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIA · top performer

Troy Johnston
RF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
TEX · top performer

Kyle Higashioka
C
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .322 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .281 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .248 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .244 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .263 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .283 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .255 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .248 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .233 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 63 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 22 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 143 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .183 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .217 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .208 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .275 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .247 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .253 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .233 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .260 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .239 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .241 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 33 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 94 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 145 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIA
TEX
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
8
4
Runs
3
1
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 3-0
Season series
MIA leads series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 23pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
T. Johnston
RFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
A. Mazur
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 2 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
K. Higashioka
CBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
J. Leiter
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 4 K · 4 ER · 8 H · 1 BB
How it ended
MIA beat TEX 4-3. Duran's play in the bottom 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (23pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
TEX vs MIA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactDuran · singled to center.
Johnston · homered to right (361 feet).
Pederson · flied out to left.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| TEX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Period scoring
MIA won 3 · TEX won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Johnston 1
Inn 3
Osuna 1
Inn 4
Wagaman 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Johnston 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Higashioka 1
Play-by-play · 581 plays
End of the 9th inning
MIA 4·TEX 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pederson flied out to left.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
−17pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Helman to second on wild pitch by Faucher, Langford to third on wild pitch by Faucher.
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Helman to second on wild pitch by Faucher, Langford to third on wild pitch by Faucher.
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Calvin Faucher pitches to Joc Pederson
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Helman walked.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
+8pp
Pitch 4 : Ball 4
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Langford to second on passed ball by Ramírez.
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Langford to second on passed ball by Ramírez.
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Calvin Faucher pitches to Michael Helman
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Duran popped out to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
−12pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 4·TEX 3
Team stats
MIA
Away
Stat
TEX
Home
4
Runs
3
10
Hits
8
1
Errors
0
17
TB
11
2
HR
1
3
BB
4
7
K
7
16
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 89 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
58.9%
ensemble · TEX favored
Elo Static
57.9%
P(TEX win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
59.0%
P(TEX win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
58.4%
P(TEX win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.45 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.