
DET
84-64

MIA
69-79
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
DET 2 · MIA 8 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked DET +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Detroit Tigers, 8–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Riley Greene
LF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Heriberto Hernandez
LF
3-2
AB-H
3
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


DET
84-64
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.18 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 4-31 | 31 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 3.0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
MIA
69-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.891 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| Team | 8-32 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
8
2
Runs
8
0
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 2-1
Season series
MIA leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 4th Inning
R. Greene
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
T. Skubal
SPStarting pitcher
3.1 IP · 2 K · 4 ER · 4 H
H. Hernandez
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.417 OPS
S. Alcantara
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 8 K · 2 ER · 4 H
How it ended
MIA beat DET 8-2. Sanoja's play in the bottom 4th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
MIA vs DET
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHern · ández homered to right (354 feet).
Greene · homered to center (401 feet).
Sanoja · doubled to left, Acosta scored and Hernández scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
DET won 1 · MIA won 4
Inn 1
Ram 1
Inn 2
Hern 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Greene 1
Sanoja 2
Inn 5
Inn 6
Wiemer 3
Inn 7
Sweeney 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 473 plays
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Sweeney grounded into fielder's choice to second, Keith out at second.
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
George Soriano pitches to Trey Sweeney
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Keith grounded into fielder's choice to second, Torkelson out at second.
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
George Soriano pitches to Colt Keith
· ·
DET 2·MIA 8
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Torkelson walked.
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 5 : Ball 4
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
DET 2·MIA 8
George Soriano pitches to Spencer Torkelson
·
DET 2·MIA 8
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Greene struck out swinging.
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 5 : Ball 1
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
DET 2·MIA 8
George Soriano pitches to Riley Greene
·
DET 2·MIA 8
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
2
Runs
8
4
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
8
TB
19
1
HR
3
2
BB
1
10
K
5
11
LOB
6
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · DET favored
Elo Static
46.1%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
42.4%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.3%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.08 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
86% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs