
ATL
61-72

MIA
62-71
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
ATL
league avg
MIA
.751
OPS
.715
.707
.323
OBP
.319
.324
5.10
Runs / G
4.50
4.34
3.28
Team ERA
4.17
4.11
1.17
WHIP
1.31
1.25
8.8
K / 9
8.5
8.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATL wins
ATL 12 · MIA 1 (by 11)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIA +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
tlanta Braves went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 12–1. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATL · top performer

Jurickson Profar
LF
3-2
AB-H
4
R
2
RBI
MIA · top performer

Jakob Marsee
CF
3-2
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| .265 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .301 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| .276 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .233 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .251 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .233 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .600 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .273 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .234 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 97 | |
| 2.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 114 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .288 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .237 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .356 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .266 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .232 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .260 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .223 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .143 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .246 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .280 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 96 | |
| 2.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 44 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 43 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 209 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATL
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
5
12
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
ATL wins series 8-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 14pp · Top 3rd Inning
J. Profar
LFBatter of the game2-HR game
2-for-3 · 2 HR · 3.500 OPS
J. Wentz
RPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.2 IP · 5 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
J. Marsee
CFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1.417 OPS
R. Gusto
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 2 K · 9 ER · 7 H · 5 BB
How it ended
ATL beat MIA 12-1.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIA vs ATL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactOlson · homered to center (426 feet), Profar scored.
Albies · homered to right (391 feet), Acuña Jr. scored and Baldwin scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
ATL won 5 · MIA won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Albies 3
Inn 4
Albies 2
Inn 5
Hill 1
Inn 6
II 2
Inn 7
Profar 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 616 plays
End of the 9th inning
ATL 12·MIA 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Myers grounded out to shortstop.
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Hunter Stratton pitches to Dane Myers
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Wagaman flied out to right.
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Hunter Stratton pitches to Eric Wagaman
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Johnston grounded out to second.
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Hunter Stratton pitches to Troy Johnston
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
ATL 12·MIA 1
Middle of the 9th inning
ATL 12·MIA 1
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Baldwin flied out to left.
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Javier Sanoja pitches to Drake Baldwin
· ·
ATL 12·MIA 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Acuña Jr. walked.
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
ATL 12·MIA 1
Team stats
ATL
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
12
Runs
1
11
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
28
TB
6
5
HR
0
10
BB
2
8
K
6
15
LOB
7
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 87 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.4%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
54.0%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.9%
P(MIA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
54.2%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.13 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.