
STL
63-65

MIA
60-67
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
STL 2 · MIA 6 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off St. Louis Cardinals, 6–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
STL · top performer

Willson Contreras
1B
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Troy Johnston
RF
2-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


STL
63-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT28.891 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 5-34 | 34 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 1 |
MIA
60-67
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.614 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-31 | 31 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSTL
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
9
2
Runs
6
1
Errors
1
Current series
STL wins series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 3-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 17pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
W. Contreras
1BBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
A. Pallante
SPStarting pitcher
5.1 IP · 4 K · 5 ER · 8 H · 3 BB
T. Johnston
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
S. Alcantara
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 9 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
MIA beat STL 6-2.
Win probability
MIA vs STL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactJohnston · walked, Wiemer to second, Hernández to third.
Hern · ández singled to center, Marsee scored and Ramírez scored.
Nootbaar · hit a ground rule double, Pozo scored, Walker to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | 6 |
Period scoring
STL won 0 · MIA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Sanoja 1
Inn 3
Hern 2
Inn 4
Inn 5
Nootbaar 1
Johnston 1
Inn 6
Contreras 1
Acosta 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Marsee 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 574 plays
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Walker struck out swinging.
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Calvin Faucher pitches to Jordan Walker
·
STL 2·MIA 6
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pozo flied out to left.
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Calvin Faucher pitches to Yohel Pozo
·
STL 2·MIA 6
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Saggese struck out swinging.
·
STL 2·MIA 6
+0.5pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Calvin Faucher pitches to Thomas Saggese
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Faucher relieved Henriquez
·
STL 2·MIA 6
Top of the 9th inning
STL 2·MIA 6
Team stats
STL
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
2
Runs
6
5
Hits
9
1
Errors
1
9
TB
12
1
HR
1
1
BB
7
13
K
7
11
LOB
29
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 83 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
54.7%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
55.3%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
55.8%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.26 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs