
CLE
49-46

MIA
52-43
Line movement
49 snapshots
MIA spread
-1.5
open -1.5
Total
O/U 7.0
open O/U 7.0
MIA no-vig %
53.2%
open 53.2%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CLE
league avg
MIA
.680
OPS
.719
▶.732
.310
OBP
.318
▶.325
3.95
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.39
3.76
Team ERA
4.18
4.00
1.26
WHIP
1.30
▶1.24
9.4
K / 9
8.5
8.5
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CLE wins
CLE 3 · MIA 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CLE +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Team pages
Elsewhere in the MLB
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+104
Close price
+104
Open no-vig
46.8%
Close no-vig
46.8%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
How we read this game
CLE · top performer

Chase DeLauter
RF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MIA · top performer

Heriberto Hernandez
LF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 20pp · Top 4th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .242 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .272 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .282 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .213 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .178 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .206 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .209 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .289 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .221 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 91 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 142 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .341 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .301 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .273 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .217 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .245 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .200 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .240 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .285 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .260 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 99 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 23 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 122 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCLE
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
4
3
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CLE
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
3
Runs
2
5
Hits
4
0
Errors
0
8
TB
10
1
HR
2
0
BB
5
9
K
3
2
LOB
11
Current series
CLE wins series 3-0
Season series
CLE leads series 1-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIA -1.5
Total
7.0
Defensive · -1.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 49 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
7.0
0.0 since open
How it ended
CLE beat MIA 3-2. C. DeLauter led the way — 2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS. DeLauter's play in the top 4th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (20pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIA vs CLE
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactDeLauter · homered to right center (430 feet), Rocchio scored.
Jim · énez homered to left center (407 feet).
Mack · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
CLE won 2 · MIA won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
DeLauter 2
Inn 5
Bazzana 1
Inn 6
Hern 1
Inn 7
Jim 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 512 plays
End of the 9th inning
CLE 3·MIA 2
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Marsee flied out to left.
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
−3pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Cade Smith pitches to Jakob Marsee
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Conine popped out to second.BIG MOMENT
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
−6pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Cade Smith pitches to Griffin Conine
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Conine hit for Ruiz
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Hicks flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
−8pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Cade Smith pitches to Liam Hicks
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Smith relieved Gaddis
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Hicks hit for Jiménez
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
CLE 3·MIA 2
Middle of the 9th inning
CLE 3·MIA 2
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Hoskins grounded out to third.
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CLE 3·MIA 2
Betting line
MIA -1.5·O/U 7·CLE +104/MIA -126
Recap · MLB
leveland Guardians went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 3–2. It came down to the final possession.
CLE +1.5 cashed (MIA lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 7.0 by 2.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 115 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
45.4%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
47.5%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
46.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
48.0%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.76 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.