HomeScoresLiveTonight's picks
Live · 11
  • MLBTop 7
    ARI 2@CIN 2
    -7.3pppeak
  • MLBBot 6
    NYY 5@TOR 7
    +63.0pplow
  • MLBTop 4
    STL 3@MIN 1
    -39.7pplow
  • MLBTop 8
    SD 3@BAL 7
    +50.3pplow
  • MLBBot 3
    ATL 2@NYM 6
    +58.9pplow
  • MLBTop 4
    HOU 9@KC 5
    -49.3pplow
  • MLBBot 2
    SEA 5@WSH 0
    -47.1pplow
  • MLBTop 8
    TEX 1@BOS 7
    +51.9pplow
  • MLBMid 6
    LAD 2@CHW 8
    +53.3pplow
  • MLBBot 8
    PHI 0@MIL 6
    +40.0pplow
  • WNBA1:04 - 4th
    TOR 80@WSH 83
    +18.1pppeak
Free during beta —Free during beta — to track favorite players + get game alertsto track favorites + alerts
  • NBA logo
  • NHL logo
  • WNBA logo
  • MLB logo
  • UFC logo
  • NFL logo
THE ONE Analytics
Beta
MLB logoMLBHubScoresOddsPicksEdgesStandingsTrendsTeamsPlayersLeadersMethodologyGlossaryRoadmapAbout
FINAL+2CIN
CIN

CIN

7-3

2
0
MIA

MIA

6-4

loanDepot park · Miami, Florida
10,934 attended

Line movement

13 snapshots

MIA spread

-1.5

open -1.5

Total

O/U 8.5

open O/U 8.5

MIA no-vig %

57.2%

open 57.2%

-1.0-2.0MIA SPREADO/U 9.0O/U 8.0TOTAL61.2%53.2%MIA NO-VIG %May 4, 10 AMJun 12, 9 PM

Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

MLB Stats API

CIN

CIN

league avg

MIA

MIA

.708

OPS

.715

.707

.314

OBP

.319

▶

.324

4.24

Runs / G

4.50

▶

4.34

4.77

Team ERA

4.17

▶

4.11

1.47

WHIP

1.31

▶

1.25

7.9

K / 9

8.5

▶

8.8

Postgame · final

The morning-after recap.

Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.

Final

CIN wins

CIN 2 · MIA 0 (by 2)

Model verdict

✗ Missed

Picked MIA +3pp

Against the spread

No spread

Line score

Inning by inning

Team123456789R
CIN0001000102
MIA0000000000

Final play

“End of the 9th inning”

What's next

Tomorrow's slate is open.

See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.

MLB edges →Full slate →
Tomorrow's board↗Tomorrow's board↗

21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.

↳ Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant

Build your edge. Every week.

Weekly research digest

One email per week · unsubscribe anytime

THE ONE Analytics

Elite sports analytics across NFL, NBA, MLB, WNBA, NCAA football, and NCAA basketball. Statcast-style advanced metrics, AI-graded prop analysis, and a model edge against Vegas refreshed every night.

6 leagues live · model running
Beta · every feature free

Sports

  • NFL
  • WNBA
  • CFB
  • NBA
  • CBB
  • MLB
  • NHL
  • UFC
  • Soccer
  • Horse Racing

Product

  • Features
  • Sports coverage
  • Best bets
  • Live games
  • Futures
  • 2026 Draft Big Board
  • Cross-sport rankings
  • Model accuracy
  • Yesterday's recap
  • NFL player directory
  • NBA head-to-head
  • Box scores · cross-sport
  • Sportsbooks by state
  • My bets
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Pricing

Company

  • About
  • Notes
  • Partners
  • Press kit
  • Roadmap
  • Changelog
  • Brand kit
  • Sign in

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Betting Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Responsible Gambling
21+

Analytics for entertainment + research. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit ncpgambling.org.

Resources →

© 2026 The One Analytics. All rights reserved. · [email protected]

Analytical research only · not gambling advice · bet responsibly

Model heartbeat

Cross-sport · last 14 days

67%Last 7 · 65-32
61%Last 30 · 303-190
Receipts →

The receipts

Closing-line value.

0.00

CLV pp

Open price

+123

Close price

+123

Open no-vig

42.8%

Close no-vig

42.8%

Line barely moved · Graded: hit

MLB·Mon, Apr 6·Final/Seriestied 2-2/VegasMIA -149

Recap · MLB

Cincinnati Reds went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 2–0.

CIN +1.5 cashed (MIA lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 8.5 by 6.5.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

Win-probability impactWPA · win prob added
  1. 1B. WilliamsonCIN+30.7pp
  2. 2J. JunkMIA−19.6pp
  3. 3J. MarseeMIA−18.9pp

CIN · top performer

CIN
Tyler Stephenson

Tyler Stephenson

C

1.667OPS

3-1

AB-H

1

R

1

RBI

MIA · top performer

MIA
Otto Lopez

Otto Lopez

SS

1.000OPS

4-2

AB-H

0

R

0

RBI

MLB · Cincinnati Reds at Miami Marlins · final

MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST

Final

Batters

batting box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerAVGABRHRBIHRBBK
T. FriedlCF
.1474020001
M. McLain2B
.2163000011
E. De La CruzSS
.2684120000
S. Stewart1B
.3534011000
E. SuarezDH
.2114000000
S. SteerLF
.1883000001
W. BensonRF
.2384010001
T. StephensonC
.1673111100
K. Hayes3B
.1153000000
- D. MyersCF
.2670000010
Team32272124

Pitchers

pitching box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerIPHRERBBKPC
B. WilliamsonSP
6.23001493
B. BurkeRP
0.1000016
T. SantillanRP
1.00001115
E. PaganRP
1.00000013
Team9.030026127

Batters

batting box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerAVGABRHRBIHRBBK
A. SlaterRF
.1333000002
A. RamirezC
.2333010011
J. MarseeCF
.1054000001
O. LopezSS
.3514020000
H. HernandezLF
.1114000001
C. Norby1B
.1483000000
X. Edwards2B
.4323000001
L. Jimenez3B
.2862000000
J. Sanoja3B
.3753000000
- O. CaissieRF
.2960000010
- L. HicksC
.3201000000
Team30030026

Pitchers

pitching box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerIPHRERBBKPC
J. JunkSP
7.17221387
T. PhillipsRP
1.20001123
Team9.072224110

Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail

Statcast · via Baseball Savant

CIN

  • B. Williamson
    93 pitches·32% CSW
    • CH
      28%·85.9 mph·64% whiff
    • FC
      28%·88.9 mph·8% whiff
    • FF
      22%·93.1 mph·0% whiff
    • CU
      11%·75.9 mph·33% whiff
    • ST
      6%·81.2 mph·50% whiff
    • SI
      5%·93.4 mph·0% whiff
  • T. Santillan
    15 pitches·33% CSW
    • FF
      73%·94.3 mph·25% whiff
    • SV
      27%·84.2 mph·50% whiff
  • E. Pagan
    13 pitches·23% CSW
    • FF
      77%·94.9 mph·0% whiff
    • FC
      15%·85.8 mph·100% whiff
    • FS
      8%·83.1 mph·— whiff
  • B. Burke
    6 pitches·50% CSW
    • FF
      83%·96.1 mph·0% whiff
    • CH
      17%·87.2 mph·100% whiff

MIA

  • J. Junk
    87 pitches·26% CSW
    • FF
      28%·94.5 mph·0% whiff
    • CH
      26%·86.8 mph·60% whiff
    • SL
      26%·85.9 mph·13% whiff
    • ST
      14%·79.2 mph·0% whiff
    • CU
      6%·81.1 mph·33% whiff
  • T. Phillips
    23 pitches·26% CSW
    • SI
      39%·96.6 mph·0% whiff
    • CU
      26%·84.3 mph·33% whiff
    • FS
      17%·87.7 mph·— whiff
    • ST
      17%·85.1 mph·100% whiff

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

7

Hits

3

2

Runs

0

0

Errors

1

Current series

Series tied 2-2

Apr 6CINCIN2@MIAMIA0today
Apr 7CINCIN6@MIAMIA3
Apr 8CINCIN4@MIAMIA7
Apr 9CINCIN1@MIAMIA8

Season series

CIN leads series 1-0

Apr 6CINCIN2@MIAMIA0today
Apr 7CINCIN6@MIAMIA3
Apr 8CINCIN4@MIAMIA7
Apr 9CINCIN1@MIAMIA8
Aug 14MIAMIA@CINCINupcoming
Aug 15MIAMIA@CINCINupcoming
Aug 16MIAMIA@CINCINupcoming

Vegas line center

DraftKings via ESPN · 21+

Spread

MIA -1.5

Total

8.5

Standard · 0.0 vs avg

Moneyline

CINCIN+12345%
MIAMIA-14960%

Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.

SpreadBet MIA -1.5↗SpreadBet MIA -1.5↗

Line movement · 13 snapshots

ESPN-tracked · 21+

Spread

1.5

0.0 since open

Total

8.5

0.0 since open

Headlines · top performers

Game flowCIN ↔ MIA

Biggest swing: 13pp · Top 8th Inning

CINCIN
T. Stephenson

T. Stephenson

C

Batter of the game

1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS

B. Williamson

B. Williamson

SP

Starting pitcherQuality start

6.2 IP · 4 K · 0 ER · 3 H · 1 BB

MIAMIA
O. Lopez

O. Lopez

SS

Batter of the game

2-for-4 · 1.000 OPS

J. Junk

J. Junk

SP

Starting pitcher

7.1 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 7 H · 1 BB

How it ended

CIN beat MIA 2-0.

Last play

End of the 9th inning

Win probability

MIA vs CIN

0255075100I2I3I4I5I6I7I8I9

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
CINTop 4th Inning · 1-0
+10pp→ 47% WP

Stewart · singled to center, De La Cruz scored.

MIABottom 7th Inning · 1-0
+9pp→ 46% WP

Lopez · reached on infield single to shortstop.

CINTop 8th Inning · 2-0
+13pp→ 86% WP

Stephenson · homered to left (376 feet).

Linescore (innings)

Team123456789R
CIN0001000102
MIA0000000000

Period scoring

CIN won 2 · MIA won 0

0
0

Inn 1

0
0

Inn 2

0
0

Inn 3

1
0

Inn 4

Stewart 1

0
0

Inn 5

0
0

Inn 6

0
0

Inn 7

1
0

Inn 8

Stephenson 1

0
0

Inn 9

CIN
MIA

Play-by-play · 492 plays

period
event
player
  1. End 9t

    End of the 9th inning

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  2. B9

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  3. B9

    Hernández grounded out to shortstop.

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

    −2pp

  4. B9

    Pitch 8 : Ball In Play

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  5. B9

    Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  6. B9

    Pitch 6 : Ball 3

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  7. B9

    Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  8. B9

    Pitch 4 : Ball 2

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  9. B9

    Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  10. B9

    Pitch 2 : Ball 1

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  11. B9

    Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  12. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Heriberto Hernandez

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  13. B9

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  14. B9

    Lopez grounded out to shortstop.

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

    −3pp

  15. B9

    Pitch 2 : Ball In Play

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  16. B9

    Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  17. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Otto Lopez

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  18. B9

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  19. B9

    Marsee fouled out to second.

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

    −4pp

  20. B9

    Pitch 3 : Ball In Play

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  21. B9

    Pitch 2 : Ball 2

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  22. B9

    Pitch 1 : Ball 1

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  23. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Jakob Marsee

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  24. B9

    Pagán relieved Santillan

    ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  25. B9

    Bottom of the 9th inning

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  26. M9

    Middle of the 9th inning

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  27. T9

    · ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  28. T9

    Benson grounded out to second.

    · ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

    −0.5pp

  29. T9

    Pitch 5 : Ball In Play

    · ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

  30. T9

    Pitch 4 : Ball 3

    · ·

    CIN 2·MIA 0

Team stats

CIN

Away

Stat

MIA

Home

2

Runs

0

7

Hits

3

0

Errors

1

11

TB

5

1

HR

0

2

BB

2

4

K

6

10

LOB

8

Betting line

MIA -1.5·O/U 8.5·CIN +123/MIA -149

DraftKings · via ESPN

STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts

5 of 16 players in cohort
  • Matt McLainCIN · 2B
    SPRINT28.586
  • Owen CaissieMIA · RF
    SPRINT28.586
  • Spencer SteerCIN · LF
    SPRINT28.483
  • Heriberto HernandezMIA · LF
    SPRINT28.483
  • Otto LopezMIA · SS
    SPRINT28.381

Player projections

MIA vs CIN.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

130

projections · 87 high confidence

Strikeouts

  • Chase BurnsCIN
    6.9± 3.1low
  • Max MeyerMIA
    6.4± 1.9low
  • Sandy AlcantaraMIA
    4.3± 2.3low

Hits

  • Otto LopezMIA
    1.6± 1.1high
  • Blake DunnCIN
    1.2± 0.9high
  • JJ BledayCIN
    1.0± 0.6high

Total bases

  • Otto LopezMIA
    2.3± 2.0high
  • JJ BledayCIN
    1.9± 1.6high
  • Blake DunnCIN
    1.7± 1.6high

RBIs

  • Kyle StowersMIA
    0.7± 1.1high
  • JJ BledayCIN
    0.6± 0.7high
  • Sal StewartCIN
    0.6± 0.8high

Earned runs

  • Nick LodoloCIN
    3.3± 1.8low
  • Sandy AlcantaraMIA
    3.3± 3.6low
  • Chris PaddackCIN
    3.2± 2.6low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

52.5%

ensemble · MIA favored

  • Elo Static

    52.9%

    P(MIA win)

    33%

    weight

  • Elo Pitching

    54.4%

    P(MIA win)

    32%

    weight

  • Bullpen Park

    52.7%

    P(MIA win)

    34%

    weight

Disagreement

0.75 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

95% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

3 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.