
UTA
33-25-4

PHI
28-22-11
Historical comparables
Games like this · top 6 from 998 candidates
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year
Recap · NHL
tah Mammoth went into Philadelphia Flyers and beat them, 3–0.
UTA -1.5 cashed (won by 3). Total stayed UNDER 5.5 by 2.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
UTA · top performer

Dylan Guenther
RW · #11
0
G
2
A
—
SOG
PHI · top performer

Denver Barkey
C · #52
0
G
0
A
—
SOG
NHL · Utah Mammoth at Philadelphia Flyers · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


UTA
33-25-4
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
PHI
28-22-11
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
PIM
4
Season series
UTA wins series 2-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
5.5
Defensive · -3.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 12 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
5.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
UTA beat PHI 3-0.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period scoring
UTA won 2 · PHI won 0
1
2
3
Play-by-play · 291 plays
- 3rd·20:00
Game End
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:55
Nikita Grebenkin hit Alexander Kerfoot
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:50
Noah Juulsen shot blocked by Sean Durzi
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:41
Nikita Grebenkin Backhand Wide Right
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:25
Giveaway by Noah Juulsen
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:02
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Carl Grundstrom
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·19:02
Puck in Crowd
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:54
Carl Grundstrom faceoff won against Alexander Kerfoot
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:54
Puck in Benches
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:35
JJ Peterka shot blocked by Nikita Grebenkin
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:34
Logan Cooley faceoff won against Noah Cates
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:34
Goalie Stopped
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:32
Kailer Yamamoto Wrist Shot saved by Dan Vladar
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:12
Noah Cates faceoff won against Barrett Hayton
·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:12
Michael Carcone Goal (12) Wrist Shot, assists: Kevin Stenlund (9), John Marino (25)
· ·
UTA 3·PHI 0
- 3rd·18:07
Kevin Stenlund Wrist Shot Wide Right
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·17:36
John Marino Wrist Shot Wide Left
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·17:35
Kevin Stenlund faceoff won against Sean Couturier
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·17:35
Icing
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·17:31
Alexander Kerfoot Wrist Shot Wide Left
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·17:17
Clayton Keller shot blocked by Rasmus Ristolainen
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·16:31
Giveaway by JJ Peterka
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·15:33
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Christian Dvorak
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·15:33
Puck in Netting
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·15:01
Owen Tippett hit Alexander Kerfoot
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·14:51
Kevin Stenlund hit Sean Couturier
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·14:46
Michael Carcone Snap Shot Wide Left
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·14:14
Rasmus Ristolainen hit Nick Schmaltz
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
- 3rd·14:10
Dylan Guenther shot blocked by Travis Sanheim
·
UTA 2·PHI 0
Team stats
UTA
Away
Stat
PHI
Home
23
Shots
16
50.0
PCT
0.0
6
PIM
4
24
Faceoffs W
24
18
Blocks
17
19
Giveaways
12
4
Takeaways
4
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 5.5·UTA -120/PHI +100
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 skaters with EDGE
Jamie DrysdalePHI · DSKATE MPH23.098
Travis SanheimPHI · DSKATE MPH22.795
Cam YorkPHI · DSKATE MPH22.693
Christian DvorakPHI · CBURSTS3492
Denver BarkeyPHI · CBURSTS2178
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.1%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PHI win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PHI win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PHI win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
The receipts
Closing-line value.
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+100
Close price
+100
Open no-vig
47.8%
Close no-vig
47.8%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss