
LAA
62-70

TEX
67-67
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
LAA
league avg
TEX
.704
OPS
.715
.698
.316
OBP
.319
.316
4.46
Runs / G
4.50
4.00
4.65
Team ERA
4.16
▶3.74
1.43
WHIP
1.31
▶1.23
9.0
K / 9
8.5
8.5
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TEX wins
LAA 3 · TEX 7 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked TEX +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| TEX | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
exas Rangers held off Los Angeles Angels, 7–3.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
LAA · top performer

Zach Neto
SS
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
TEX · top performer

Corey Seager
SS
2-1
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .268 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .235 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .232 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .234 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .247 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .203 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .190 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .143 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .217 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .233 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 81 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 25 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 23 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 146 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .248 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .219 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .267 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| .228 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .243 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .147 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .243 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .221 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .211 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .270 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 102 | |
| 0.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 129 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
7
3
Runs
7
0
Errors
0
Current series
TEX wins series 5-1
Season series
TEX leads series 7-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 14pp · Bottom 1st Inning
Z. Neto
SSBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
Y. Kikuchi
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 3 K · 6 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
C. Seager
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.750 OPS
P. Corbin
SPStarting pitcherGem
8.0 IP · 8 K · 0 ER · 3 H · 1 BB
How it ended
TEX beat LAA 7-3.
Win probability
TEX vs LAA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactLangford · walked.
A. Garc · ía doubled to right, Langford scored, Seager to third.
Helman · homered to left center (383 feet), Heim scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| TEX | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 7 |
Period scoring
LAA won 0 · TEX won 4
Inn 1
Garc 1
Inn 2
Helman 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Higashioka 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Seager 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Adell 2
Play-by-play · 519 plays
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
d'Arnaud struck out looking.
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Looking
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Phil Maton pitches to Travis d'Arnaud
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Rengifo fouled out to third.
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Phil Maton pitches to Luis Rengifo
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Maton relieved Coulombe
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Adell homered to left (408 feet), Trout scored.
· ·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 9 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAA 3·TEX 7
Pitch 8 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Danny Coulombe pitches to Jo Adell
· ·
LAA 3·TEX 7
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Lugo flied out to center.
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
LAA 1·TEX 7
Team stats
LAA
Away
Stat
TEX
Home
3
Runs
7
6
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
13
TB
17
2
HR
3
1
BB
4
9
K
7
9
LOB
7
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 66 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
57.8%
ensemble · TEX favored
Elo Static
57.4%
P(TEX win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.9%
P(TEX win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.9%
P(TEX win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.41 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.