
MIA
50-55

STL
55-53
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
MIA 1 · STL 7 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIA +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals held off Miami Marlins, 7–1. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIA · top performer
Jack Winkler
2B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
STL · top performer

Alec Burleson
1B
2-1
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIA
50-55
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 4-31 | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 1 |
STL
55-53
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.891 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT29.798 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8-32 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIA
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
8
1
Runs
7
3
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 2-1
Season series
STL leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 12pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
J. Winkler
2BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
E. Cabrera
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
A. Burleson
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.667 OPS
A. Pallante
SPStarting pitcherGem
7.0 IP · 4 K · 0 ER · 1 H · 1 BB
How it ended
STL beat MIA 7-1.
Win probability
STL vs MIA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWinn · doubled to left.
Burleson · homered to center (411 feet).
Saggese · walked.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | 7 |
Period scoring
MIA won 0 · STL won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Burleson 1
Inn 4
Saggese 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Winn 3
Inn 8
Inn 9
Hern 1
Play-by-play · 530 plays
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Hicks struck out looking.
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Liam Hicks
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Winkler singled to right, Hernández to third.
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Hernández to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIA 1·STL 7
Hernández to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Jack Winkler
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
·
MIA 1·STL 7
Hernández singled to right, J. Sánchez scored.
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
J. Sánchez to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIA 0·STL 7
J. Sánchez to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIA 0·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 0·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Heriberto Hernandez
· ·
MIA 1·STL 7
· ·
MIA 0·STL 7
Ramírez lined out to center.
· ·
MIA 0·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 0·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 0·STL 7
Team stats
MIA
Away
Stat
STL
Home
1
Runs
7
4
Hits
8
3
Errors
0
4
TB
17
0
HR
1
2
BB
5
6
K
7
10
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 83 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.5%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
49.6%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.5%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.1%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.89 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.