
SEA
73-64

CLE
68-67
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SEA wins
SEA 4 · CLE 2 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked SEA +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
eattle Mariners went into Cleveland Guardians and beat them, 4–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
SEA · top performer

Julio Rodriguez
CF
4-2
AB-H
0
R
2
RBI
CLE · top performer

Daniel Schneemann
CF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


SEA
73-64
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT23.81 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| Team | 9-33 | 33 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
CLE
68-67
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.411 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 2-29 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSEA
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
2
4
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Current series
CLE wins series 2-1
Season series
SEA wins series 4-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 29pp · Top 7th Inning
R. Arozarena
LFBatter of the game
1-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.000 OPS
B. Miller
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 2 H · 1 BB
D. Schneemann
CFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
T. Bibee
SPStarting pitcher
6.1 IP · 4 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
How it ended
SEA beat CLE 4-2. Rodr's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (29pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CLE vs SEA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSchneemann · homered to right center (408 feet), Kwan scored.
Arozarena · homered to left center (421 feet), Crawford scored.
Rodr · íguez reached on infield single to second, Crawford scored and Young scored, Raleigh to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
SEA won 2 · CLE won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Schneemann 2
Inn 4
Inn 5
Arozarena 2
Inn 6
Inn 7
Rodr 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 504 plays
End of the 9th inning
SEA 4·CLE 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Ramírez lined out to first.
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
−2pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Andres Munoz pitches to Jose Ramirez
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Schneemann struck out swinging.
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
−3pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Andres Munoz pitches to Daniel Schneemann
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Kwan struck out looking.
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
−3pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Looking
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Andres Munoz pitches to Steven Kwan
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Muñoz relieved Brash
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
SEA 4·CLE 2
Middle of the 9th inning
SEA 4·CLE 2
·
SEA 4·CLE 2
Team stats
SEA
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
4
Runs
2
9
Hits
2
0
Errors
0
12
TB
6
1
HR
1
3
BB
1
5
K
8
17
LOB
2
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 74 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.8%
ensemble · SEA favored
Elo Static
49.6%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
51.3%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
48.5%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.15 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
92% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.