
CIN
66-60

LAA
60-65
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CIN
league avg
LAA
.708
OPS
.715
.705
.314
OBP
.319
.317
4.24
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.46
4.76
Team ERA
4.17
▶4.65
1.47
WHIP
1.31
▶1.43
7.9
K / 9
8.5
▶9.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
CIN 4 · LAA 1 (by 3)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CIN +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| LAA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds went into Los Angeles Angels and beat them, 4–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Gavin Lux
LF
5-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
LAA · top performer

Nolan Schanuel
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .281 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .275 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .262 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .299 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .240 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .256 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .236 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .220 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 36 | 4 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 88 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 19 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 24 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 25 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 156 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .269 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .272 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .235 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .237 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .238 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .228 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .189 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .256 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 33 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 95 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 27 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 154 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
LAA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
8
4
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
CIN wins series 2-1
Season series
CIN leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 13pp · Top 1st Inning
G. Lux
LFBatter of the game
2-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.400 OPS
B. Singer
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
N. Schanuel
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 R · 1.000 OPS
V. Mederos
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 3 ER · 9 H · 3 BB
How it ended
CIN beat LAA 4-1.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
LAA vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactLux · homered to right (387 feet), Friedl scored.
Ward · doubled to right, Schanuel scored, Trout to third.
Hayes · tripled to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| LAA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
CIN won 3 · LAA won 0
Inn 1
Lux 2
Ward 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Hays 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
McLain 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 590 plays
End of the 9th inning
CIN 4·LAA 1
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Neto struck out swinging.
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
−1pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Zach Neto
· ·
CIN 4·LAA 1
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Rengifo walked.
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
+1pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Luis Rengifo
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
O'Hoppe struck out swinging.
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
−1pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Scott Barlow pitches to Logan O'Hoppe
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Moore struck out swinging.
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
−2pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 4·LAA 1
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
LAA
Home
4
Runs
1
11
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
20
TB
10
1
HR
0
3
BB
4
8
K
10
17
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 15 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 64 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
43.3%
ensemble · CIN favored
Elo Static
49.6%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
45.6%
P(LAA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.6%
P(LAA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.87 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
88% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.