
CHC
76-58

SF
66-68
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHC
league avg
SF
.721
OPS
.715
.728
.331
OBP
.319
.309
4.53
Runs / G
4.50
4.13
4.30
Team ERA
4.17
4.54
1.25
WHIP
1.31
1.41
8.1
K / 9
8.5
8.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SF wins
CHC 3 · SF 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| SF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
an Francisco Giants held off Chicago Cubs, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Dansby Swanson
SS
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
SF · top performer

Willy Adames
SS
4-2
AB-H
2
R
3
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .260 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .265 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .256 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .290 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .208 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .247 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .216 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .228 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 92 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | |
| 0.1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Team | 8.1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 123 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .265 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .241 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .224 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| .231 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .245 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .261 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .201 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .210 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 94 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 117 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
SF
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
8
3
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Current series
SF wins series 3-0
Season series
SF wins series 5-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 33pp · Top 6th Inning
D. Swanson
SSBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 5 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
W. Adames
SSBatter of the game2-HR game
2-for-4 · 2 HR · 2.500 OPS
L. Webb
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 7 K · 3 ER · 7 H
How it ended
SF beat CHC 4-3. Busch's play in the top 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (33pp).
Win probability
SF vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactAdames · homered to left center (417 feet), Devers scored.
Busch · homered to center (412 feet).
Lee · singled to right, Koss scored, Flores to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| SF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · SF won 2
Inn 1
Happ 1
Adames 2
Inn 2
Swanson 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Busch 1
Adames 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Lee 1
Play-by-play · 481 plays
· ·
CHC 3·SF 4
Lee singled to right, Koss scored, Flores to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 3·SF 4
+32pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 3·SF 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Jung Hoo Lee
· ·
CHC 3·SF 4
Koss ran for Schmitt
·
CHC 3·SF 3
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Flores singled to center, Schmitt to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
+6pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Wilmer Flores
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Schmitt singled to center.BIG MOMENT
·
CHC 3·SF 3
+5pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Casey Schmitt
·
CHC 3·SF 3
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Chapman grounded out to third.BIG MOMENT
·
CHC 3·SF 3
−6pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Matt Chapman
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Palencia relieved Keller
·
CHC 3·SF 3
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHC 3·SF 3
Middle of the 9th inning
CHC 3·SF 3
· ·
CHC 3·SF 3
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
SF
Home
3
Runs
4
8
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
16
TB
14
2
HR
2
1
BB
1
9
K
6
7
LOB
6
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
41.8%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
44.2%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
44.8%
P(SF win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
45.6%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.58 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.