
PHI
70-52

WSH
49-73
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
PHI
league avg
WSH
.681
OPS
.715
▶.740
.296
OBP
.319
▶.322
4.00
Runs / G
4.50
▶5.33
4.04
Team ERA
4.17
4.74
1.30
WHIP
1.31
1.40
9.5
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PHI wins
PHI 6 · WSH 2 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked PHI +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| WSH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hiladelphia Phillies went into Washington Nationals and beat them, 6–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Kyle Schwarber
DH
3-1
AB-H
2
R
3
RBI
WSH · top performer

Daylen Lile
LF
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .286 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| .258 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .269 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .167 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .260 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .228 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .241 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .241 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .269 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 32 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 97 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | |
| 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 153 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .259 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .266 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .228 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .254 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .260 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .259 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .199 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .243 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 91 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 139 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
WSH
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
6
6
Runs
2
0
Errors
1
Current series
PHI wins series 4-3
Season series
PHI leads series 5-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 36pp · Top 7th Inning
K. Schwarber
DHBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.933 OPS
Z. Wheeler
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 6 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
D. Lile
LFBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
M. Gore
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 7 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
How it ended
PHI beat WSH 6-2. Schwarber's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (36pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
WSH vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactAbrams · doubled to center, Wood scored.
Lile · homered to right center (388 feet).
Schwarber · homered to right center (456 feet), Stott scored and Marsh scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| WSH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
PHI won 2 · WSH won 1
Inn 1
Harper 2
Abrams 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Lile 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Schwarber 3
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 576 plays
End of the 9th inning
PHI 6·WSH 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Adams lined out to right.
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
−2pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
David Robertson pitches to Riley Adams
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Crews lined out to shortstop.
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
−3pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
David Robertson pitches to Dylan Crews
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Lile struck out swinging.
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
−4pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
David Robertson pitches to Daylen Lile
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
García Jr. doubled to left, DeJong to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
+6pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
David Robertson pitches to Luis Garcia Jr.
· ·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Robertson relieved Duran
·
PHI 6·WSH 2
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
WSH
Home
6
Runs
2
6
Hits
6
0
Errors
1
13
TB
11
2
HR
1
5
BB
3
9
K
8
15
LOB
16
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 88 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.3%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
39.9%
P(WSH win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
38.1%
P(WSH win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
40.6%
P(WSH win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.05 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.