
PIT
24-24

STL
28-19
Line movement
200 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.0
open O/U 8.0
STL no-vig %
50.0%
open 49.6% · +0.4
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
PIT 6 · STL 9 (by 3)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked STL +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+5.0pp
best edge · STL · DraftKings
PIT
no live price
STL
★ bestedge +5.0pp · implied 51.7%
| Book | PIT | STL | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -106 | -123★ | +5.0 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals held off Pittsburgh Pirates, 9–6.
STL +1.5 cashed (PIT lost outright). Total cleared the 8.0 OVER by 7.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
STL · top performer

Alec Burleson
1B
3-2
AB-H
3
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PIT
24-24
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 12-40 | 40 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
STL
28-19
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.560 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT257 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 9-32 | 32 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 10.0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
12
Hits
9
6
Runs
9
0
Errors
2
Current series
PIT wins series 2-1
Season series
STL leads series 5-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
PIT -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
2· 6.3h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
0.0 since open
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 37pp · Bottom 6th Inning
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
M. Keller
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 4 H · 1 BB
A. Burleson
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.333 OPS
M. Liberatore
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 9 K · 4 ER · 7 H · 2 BB
How it ended
STL beat PIT 9-6. Gorman's play in the bottom 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (37pp).
Win probability
STL vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactReynolds · doubled to left, Gonzales scored and Triolo scored.
Gorman · homered to center (437 feet), Burleson scored.
Horwitz · singled to left, Griffin scored, Cruz to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| STL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
Period scoring
PIT won 2 · STL won 5
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Wetherholt 2
Inn 4
Gorman 1
Inn 5
Reynolds 2
Inn 6
Gorman 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Burleson 1
Inn 9
Ozuna 1
Inn 10
Herrera 3
Play-by-play · 624 plays
·
PIT 6·STL 9
Herrera homered to left center (410 feet), Scott II scored and Wetherholt scored.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·STL 9
+7pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·STL 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Mason Montgomery pitches to Ivan Herrera
· ·
PIT 6·STL 9
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Wetherholt singled to right, Scott II to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
+12pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Mason Montgomery pitches to JJ Wetherholt
·
PIT 6·STL 6
Montgomery relieved Soto
·
PIT 6·STL 6
Mangum in right field.
PIT 6·STL 6
Bottom of the 10th inning
PIT 6·STL 6
Middle of the 10th inning
PIT 6·STL 6
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Gonzales grounded out to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
+9pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
George Soriano pitches to Nick Gonzales
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Rodríguez flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
+7pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
George Soriano pitches to Endy Rodriguez
· ·
PIT 6·STL 6
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
STL
Home
6
Runs
9
12
Hits
9
0
Errors
2
13
TB
21
0
HR
4
4
BB
4
13
K
7
27
LOB
6
Betting line
PIT -1.5·O/U 8·PIT -110/STL -110
The receipts
+0.43
CLV pp
Open price
-108
Close price
-110
Open no-vig
49.6%
Close no-vig
50.0%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 82 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
55.9%
ensemble · STL favored
Elo Static
56.9%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.5%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.4%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.58 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.