
MIL
97-65

CHC
92-70
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIL
league avg
CHC
.730
OPS
.715
.721
.340
OBP
.319
.331
5.34
Runs / G
4.50
4.53
3.42
Team ERA
4.16
4.29
1.21
WHIP
1.31
1.25
9.8
K / 9
8.5
8.1
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
MIL 3 · CHC 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| CHC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs held off Milwaukee Brewers, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Jake Bauers
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
CHC · top performer

Kyle Tucker
RF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .385 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .545 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .167 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .417 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .182 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .200 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .500 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .286 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .300 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 33 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 39 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | |
| 3.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 49 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 161 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .300 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .391 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .095 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| .200 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 31 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 75 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 18 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 19 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 153 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIL
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
8
3
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Playoff series
MIL leads series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 17pp · Top 8th Inning
J. Bauers
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
J. Quintana
SPTop reliever
3.0 IP · 2 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 1 BB
K. Tucker
RFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS
J. Taillon
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CHC beat MIL 4-3.
Win probability
CHC vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCrow-Armstrong · singled to right, Hoerner scored and Tucker scored, Happ to third.
Chourio · doubled to left.
Bauers · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| CHC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
MIL won 2 · CHC won 1
Inn 1
Frelick 1
Crow-Armstrong 2
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Bauers 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Bauers 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 583 plays
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Yelich grounded out to second.
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
+3pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Brad Keller pitches to Christian Yelich
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Perkins struck out swinging.
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
+4pp
Pitch 8 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 7 : Ball 3
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Brad Keller pitches to Blake Perkins
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Vaughn flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
+7pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Brad Keller pitches to Andrew Vaughn
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Vaughn hit for Monasterio
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Top of the 9th inning
MIL 3·CHC 4
End of the 8th inning
MIL 3·CHC 4
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Swanson grounded out to third.
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
−0.7pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
MIL 3·CHC 4
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
3
Runs
4
7
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
12
TB
12
1
HR
1
3
BB
4
9
K
7
13
LOB
19
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 15 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 93 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
43.9%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
47.1%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
51.6%
P(CHC win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
45.2%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.67 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
82% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.