
CIN
83-78

MIL
96-65
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CIN
league avg
MIL
.708
OPS
.715
▶.730
.314
OBP
.319
▶.340
4.24
Runs / G
4.50
▶5.34
4.74
Team ERA
4.16
▶3.42
1.47
WHIP
1.31
▶1.21
7.9
K / 9
8.5
▶9.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
CIN 7 · MIL 4 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds went into Milwaukee Brewers and beat them, 7–4.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Sal Stewart
1B
4-2
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MIL · top performer

Jackson Chourio
LF
5-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .260 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .263 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .374 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .237 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .255 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .264 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .232 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .239 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .221 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .226 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 85 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 31 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 154 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .265 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .268 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .287 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .307 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .262 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .257 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .234 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .231 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .290 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 34 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 57 | |
| 2.1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 58 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 26 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 51 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 195 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
7
7
Runs
4
1
Errors
2
Current series
MIL wins series 4-3
Season series
MIL leads series 7-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 14pp · Top 3rd Inning
S. Stewart
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
A. Abbott
SPStarting pitcher
5.1 IP · 4 K · 3 ER · 5 H
J. Chourio
LFBatter of the game
1-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.000 OPS
C. Rodriguez
RPTop reliever
2.0 IP · 5 K · 0 ER · 1 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CIN beat MIL 7-4.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIL vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMcLain · grounded into fielder's choice to third, De La Cruz out at home.
Andujar · doubled to center, Marte to third.
Friedl · singled to left, Hayes scored, Stephenson scored and McLain scored on throwing error by left fielder Collins, Friedl to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Period scoring
CIN won 1 · MIL won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Friedl 3
Yelich 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Stewart 1
Chourio 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 651 plays
End of the 9th inning
CIN 7·MIL 4
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Chourio grounded out to shortstop.
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Emilio Pagan pitches to Jackson Chourio
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Yelich popped out to shortstop.
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
−2pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Emilio Pagan pitches to Christian Yelich
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Frelick struck out swinging.
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
−2pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Emilio Pagan pitches to Sal Frelick
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Pagán relieved Martinez
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Frelick hit for Ortiz
·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Bottom of the 9th inning
CIN 7·MIL 4
Middle of the 9th inning
CIN 7·MIL 4
· ·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Friedl struck out looking.
· ·
CIN 7·MIL 4
+0.7pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
CIN 7·MIL 4
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
7
Runs
4
10
Hits
7
1
Errors
2
14
TB
12
1
HR
1
7
BB
3
13
K
7
23
LOB
16
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.5%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
61.6%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.2%
P(MIL win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
63.2%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.87 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.