
CIN
76-76

STL
74-79
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CIN
league avg
STL
.708
OPS
.715
▶.716
.314
OBP
.319
▶.322
4.24
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.55
4.74
Team ERA
4.16
▶4.04
1.47
WHIP
1.31
▶1.33
7.9
K / 9
8.5
7.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
CIN 6 · STL 2 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked STL +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| STL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds went into St. Louis Cardinals and beat them, 6–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Spencer Steer
LF
4-3
AB-H
1
R
5
RBI
STL · top performer

Alec Burleson
1B
3-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .274 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .266 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .286 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .263 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .242 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .249 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .223 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .243 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 97 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 22 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 150 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .237 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .280 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .285 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .234 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .208 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .264 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .107 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .213 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .215 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 102 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 19 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 170 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
STL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
5
6
Runs
2
1
Errors
0
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
STL wins series 7-6
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 32pp · Top 4th Inning
S. Steer
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS
B. Singer
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
A. Burleson
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.417 OPS
A. Pallante
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
How it ended
CIN beat STL 6-2. Steer's play in the top 4th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (32pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
STL vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSteer · homered to center (411 feet), Stewart scored and De La Cruz scored.
Herrera · grounded into fielder's choice to shortstop, Nootbaar scored on throwing error by shortstop De La Cruz, Herrera second.
Steer · singled to right, Hays scored and Espinal scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| STL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
CIN won 3 · STL won 2
Inn 1
Burleson 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Steer 3
Inn 5
Cruz 1
Inn 6
Herrera 1
Inn 7
Steer 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 603 plays
End of the 9th inning
CIN 6·STL 2
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Walker struck out looking.
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Saggese to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Saggese to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Jordan Walker
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Crooks struck out swinging.
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
−1pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Jimmy Crooks
· ·
CIN 6·STL 2
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Saggese walked.
·
CIN 6·STL 2
+0.8pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Emilio Pagan pitches to Thomas Saggese
·
CIN 6·STL 2
·
CIN 6·STL 2
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
STL
Home
6
Runs
2
11
Hits
5
1
Errors
0
15
TB
9
1
HR
1
3
BB
4
9
K
11
20
LOB
14
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 74 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
49.3%
ensemble · CIN favored
Elo Static
50.8%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
49.2%
P(STL win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
51.9%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.11 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.