HomeScoresLiveTonight's picks
Live · 8
  • MLBBot 3
    COL 0@ATH 0
    +9.9ppmedium
  • MLBTop 3
    CHC 0@SF 0
    -16.7pphigh
  • MLBBot 7
    STL 7@MIN 4
    -43.6pplow
  • MLBBot 7
    ATL 3@NYM 7
    +58.9pplow
  • MLBBot 8
    HOU 9@KC 5
    -49.3pplow
  • MLBTop 5
    TB 0@LAA 4
    +62.6pplow
  • MLBTop 7
    SEA 8@WSH 1
    -47.4pplow
  • WNBA3:23 - 2nd
    GS 31@SEA 32
    +10.5pphigh
Free during beta —Free during beta — to track favorite players + get game alertsto track favorites + alerts
  • NBA logo
  • NHL logo
  • WNBA logo
  • MLB logo
  • UFC logo
  • NFL logo
THE ONE Analytics
Beta
MLB logoMLBHubScoresOddsPicksEdgesStandingsTrendsTeamsPlayersLeadersMethodologyGlossaryRoadmapAbout
FINAL+4CIN
CIN

CIN

76-76

6
2
STL

STL

74-79

Busch Stadium · St. Louis, Missouri
23,462 attended

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

MLB Stats API

CIN

CIN

league avg

STL

STL

.708

OPS

.715

▶

.716

.314

OBP

.319

▶

.322

4.24

Runs / G

4.50

▶

4.55

4.74

Team ERA

4.16

▶

4.04

1.47

WHIP

1.31

▶

1.33

7.9

K / 9

◀

8.5

7.8

Postgame · final

The morning-after recap.

Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.

Final

CIN wins

CIN 6 · STL 2 (by 4)

Model verdict

✗ Missed

Picked STL +1pp

Against the spread

No spread

Line score

Inning by inning

Team123456789R
CIN0003102006
STL1000010002

Final play

“End of the 9th inning”

What's next

Tomorrow's slate is open.

See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.

MLB edges →Full slate →
Tomorrow's board↗Tomorrow's board↗

21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.

↳ Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant

Build your edge. Every week.

Weekly research digest

One email per week · unsubscribe anytime

THE ONE Analytics

Elite sports analytics across NFL, NBA, MLB, WNBA, NCAA football, and NCAA basketball. Statcast-style advanced metrics, AI-graded prop analysis, and a model edge against Vegas refreshed every night.

6 leagues live · model running
Beta · every feature free

Sports

  • NFL
  • WNBA
  • CFB
  • NBA
  • CBB
  • MLB
  • NHL
  • UFC
  • Soccer
  • Horse Racing

Product

  • Features
  • Sports coverage
  • Best bets
  • Live games
  • Futures
  • 2026 Draft Big Board
  • Cross-sport rankings
  • Model accuracy
  • Yesterday's recap
  • NFL player directory
  • NBA head-to-head
  • Box scores · cross-sport
  • Sportsbooks by state
  • My bets
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Pricing

Company

  • About
  • Notes
  • Partners
  • Press kit
  • Roadmap
  • Changelog
  • Brand kit
  • Sign in

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Betting Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Responsible Gambling
21+

Analytics for entertainment + research. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit ncpgambling.org.

Resources →

© 2026 The One Analytics. All rights reserved. · [email protected]

Analytical research only · not gambling advice · bet responsibly

Model heartbeat

Cross-sport · last 14 days

66%Last 7 · 69-36
61%Last 30 · 307-194
Receipts →
MLB·Wed, Sep 17·Final/Seriestied 3-3

Recap · MLB

Cincinnati Reds went into St. Louis Cardinals and beat them, 6–2.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

Win-probability impactWPA · win prob added
  1. 1S. StewartCIN+48.7pp
  2. 2S. SteerCIN+42.7pp
  3. 3A. PallanteSTL−30.2pp

CIN · top performer

CIN
Spencer Steer

Spencer Steer

LF

2.250OPS

4-3

AB-H

1

R

5

RBI

STL · top performer

STL
Alec Burleson

Alec Burleson

1B

2.417OPS

3-2

AB-H

1

R

1

RBI

MLB · Cincinnati Reds at St. Louis Cardinals · final

MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST

Final

Batters

batting box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerAVGABRHRBIHRBBK
G. LuxLF
.2675130001
N. MarteRF
.2745020001
W. BensonRF
.2275000001
A. HaysLF
.2665110000
S. Stewart1B
.2862110020
E. De La CruzSS
.2633100012
S. SteerLF
.2424135100
J. TrevinoC
.2494010001
M. McLain2B
.2234000003
- S. Espinal3B
.2431100000
Team386115139

Pitchers

pitching box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerIPHRERBBKPC
B. SingerSP
5.23212697
G. AshcraftRP
0.1000015
C. BurnsSP
2.02001126
E. PaganRP
1.00001322
Team9.0521411150

Batters

batting box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerAVGABRHRBIHRBBK
L. NootbaarLF
.2373110011
I. HerreraDH
.2804000000
A. Burleson1B
.2853121111
N. Arenado3B
.2344000001
N. Gorman3B
.2084000003
T. SaggeseLF
.2643010011
J. CrooksC
.1074010001
J. WalkerRF
.2134000003
V. Scott IICF
.2152000010
Team312511411

Pitchers

pitching box score — tap a column header to sort; players who did not play sink to the bottom.
PlayerIPHRERBBKPC
A. PallanteSP
5.064433102
J. AlcalaRP
1.02000122
M. SvansonRP
1.03220219
R. FernandezRP
1.00000211
G. GraceffoRP
1.00000116
Team9.0116639170

Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail

Statcast · via Baseball Savant

CIN

  • B. Singer
    97 pitches·32% CSW
    • SI
      42%·92.2 mph·20% whiff
    • SL
      33%·82.7 mph·44% whiff
    • FF
      9%·91.1 mph·33% whiff
    • ST
      8%·80.6 mph·0% whiff
    • FC
      7%·86.8 mph·33% whiff
  • C. Burns
    26 pitches·19% CSW
    • FF
      69%·100.2 mph·27% whiff
    • SI
      15%·100.1 mph·0% whiff
    • SL
      15%·91.4 mph·0% whiff
  • E. Pagan
    22 pitches·36% CSW
    • FF
      68%·95.5 mph·25% whiff
    • FS
      18%·82.2 mph·67% whiff
    • FC
      14%·86.9 mph·100% whiff
  • G. Ashcraft
    5 pitches·60% CSW
    • SL
      80%·88.1 mph·100% whiff
    • FC
      20%·94.7 mph·— whiff

STL

  • A. Pallante
    102 pitches·25% CSW
    • FF
      32%·94.5 mph·17% whiff
    • SL
      27%·86.3 mph·31% whiff
    • KC
      21%·78.2 mph·50% whiff
    • SI
      20%·94.5 mph·17% whiff
  • J. Alcala
    22 pitches·32% CSW
    • FF
      36%·96.6 mph·0% whiff
    • CU
      32%·85.6 mph·0% whiff
    • SI
      23%·97.4 mph·33% whiff
    • SL
      9%·89.1 mph·50% whiff
  • M. Svanson
    19 pitches·21% CSW
    • ST
      53%·87.6 mph·0% whiff
    • SI
      37%·97.0 mph·0% whiff
    • FC
      11%·91.7 mph·0% whiff
  • G. Graceffo
    16 pitches·25% CSW
    • FF
      38%·97.7 mph·0% whiff
    • CU
      31%·84.5 mph·50% whiff
    • SL
      19%·89.8 mph·0% whiff
    • SI
      13%·96.6 mph·0% whiff
  • R. Fernandez
    11 pitches·45% CSW
    • SL
      45%·86.1 mph·67% whiff
    • FF
      36%·94.7 mph·50% whiff
    • CH
      18%·86.3 mph·0% whiff

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

11

Hits

5

6

Runs

2

1

Errors

0

Current series

Series tied 3-3

Jun 20CINCIN1@STLSTL6
Jun 21CINCIN5@STLSTL6
Jun 22CINCIN4@STLSTL1
Sep 15CINCIN11@STLSTL6
Sep 16CINCIN0@STLSTL3
Sep 17CINCIN6@STLSTL2today

Season series

STL wins series 7-6

Apr 28STLSTL1@CINCIN3
Apr 29STLSTL0@CINCIN0
Apr 30STLSTL6@CINCIN0
Apr 30STLSTL9@CINCIN1
May 1STLSTL1@CINCIN9
Jun 20CINCIN1@STLSTL6
Jun 21CINCIN5@STLSTL6
Jun 22CINCIN4@STLSTL1
Aug 29STLSTL7@CINCIN5
Aug 30STLSTL4@CINCIN2
Aug 31STLSTL4@CINCIN7
Sep 15CINCIN11@STLSTL6
Sep 16CINCIN0@STLSTL3
Sep 17CINCIN6@STLSTL2today

Headlines · top performers

Game flowCIN ↔ STL

Biggest swing: 32pp · Top 4th Inning

CINCIN
S. Steer

S. Steer

LF

Batter of the gamePerfect day

3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS

B. Singer

B. Singer

SP

Starting pitcher

5.2 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB

STLSTL
A. Burleson

A. Burleson

1B

Batter of the gamePerfect day

2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.417 OPS

A. Pallante

A. Pallante

SP

Starting pitcher

5.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 3 BB

How it ended

CIN beat STL 6-2. Steer's play in the top 4th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (32pp).

Last play

End of the 9th inning

Win probability

STL vs CIN

0255075100I2I3I4I5I6I7I8I9

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
CINTop 4th Inning · 3-1
+32pp→ 72% WP

Steer · homered to center (411 feet), Stewart scored and De La Cruz scored.

STLBottom 6th Inning · 4-2
+15pp→ 36% WP

Herrera · grounded into fielder's choice to shortstop, Nootbaar scored on throwing error by shortstop De La Cruz, Herrera second.

CINTop 7th Inning · 6-2
+13pp→ 94% WP

Steer · singled to right, Hays scored and Espinal scored.

Linescore (innings)

Team123456789R
CIN0003102006
STL1000010002

Period scoring

CIN won 3 · STL won 2

0
1

Inn 1

Burleson 1

0
0

Inn 2

0
0

Inn 3

3
0

Inn 4

Steer 3

1
0

Inn 5

Cruz 1

0
1

Inn 6

Herrera 1

2
0

Inn 7

Steer 2

0
0

Inn 8

0
0

Inn 9

CIN
STL

Play-by-play · 603 plays

period
event
player
  1. End 9t

    End of the 9th inning

    CIN 6·STL 2

  2. B9

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  3. B9

    Walker struck out looking.

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  4. B9

    Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  5. B9

    Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  6. B9

    Pitch 3 : Ball 2

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  7. B9

    Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  8. B9

    Saggese to second on fielder's indifference.

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  9. B9

    Saggese to second on fielder's indifference.

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  10. B9

    Pitch 1 : Ball 1

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  11. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Jordan Walker

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  12. B9

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  13. B9

    Crooks struck out swinging.

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

    −1pp

  14. B9

    Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  15. B9

    Pitch 5 : Ball 2

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  16. B9

    Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  17. B9

    Pitch 3 : Ball 1

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  18. B9

    Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  19. B9

    Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  20. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Jimmy Crooks

    · ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  21. B9

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  22. B9

    Saggese walked.

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

    +0.8pp

  23. B9

    Pitch 6 : Ball 4

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  24. B9

    Pitch 5 : Ball 3

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  25. B9

    Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  26. B9

    Pitch 3 : Ball 2

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  27. B9

    Pitch 2 : Ball 1

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  28. B9

    Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  29. B9

    Emilio Pagan pitches to Thomas Saggese

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

  30. B9

    ·

    CIN 6·STL 2

Team stats

CIN

Away

Stat

STL

Home

6

Runs

2

11

Hits

5

1

Errors

0

15

TB

9

1

HR

1

3

BB

4

9

K

11

20

LOB

14

STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts

5 of 13 players in cohort
  • Noelvi MarteCIN · RF
    SPRINT28.992
  • Jordan WalkerSTL · RF
    SPRINT28.891
  • Spencer SteerCIN · LF
    SPRINT28.483
  • Will BensonCIN · RF
    SPRINT2872
  • Elly De La CruzCIN · SS
    SPRINT2872

Player projections

STL vs CIN.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

127

projections · 74 high confidence

Strikeouts

  • Chase BurnsCIN
    6.9± 3.1low
  • Dustin MaySTL
    5.3± 3.4low
  • Matthew LiberatoreSTL
    4.9± 3.5low

Hits

  • Jordan WalkerSTL
    1.4± 1.0high
  • Alec BurlesonSTL
    1.3± 0.5high
  • Blake DunnCIN
    1.2± 0.9high

Total bases

  • Alec BurlesonSTL
    2.6± 1.8high
  • Jordan WalkerSTL
    2.4± 1.9high
  • Lars NootbaarSTL
    2.2± 3.5low

RBIs

  • Alec BurlesonSTL
    1.0± 1.1high
  • Jordan WalkerSTL
    0.9± 1.1high
  • Lars NootbaarSTL
    0.8± 1.0low

Earned runs

  • Nick LodoloCIN
    3.3± 1.8low
  • Chris PaddackCIN
    3.2± 2.6low
  • Brady SingerCIN
    2.8± 1.8low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

49.3%

ensemble · CIN favored

  • Elo Static

    50.8%

    P(STL win)

    33%

    weight

  • Elo Pitching

    49.2%

    P(STL win)

    32%

    weight

  • Bullpen Park

    51.9%

    P(STL win)

    34%

    weight

Disagreement

1.11 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

93% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

3 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.