
CHW
50-88

MIN
62-75
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
MIN
.742
OPS
.715
.708
.329
OBP
.319
.316
4.79
Runs / G
4.50
4.54
4.25
Team ERA
4.16
4.82
1.30
WHIP
1.31
1.39
8.2
K / 9
8.5
▶8.3
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
CHW 6 · MIN 5 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIN +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MIN | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox went into Minnesota Twins and beat them, 6–5. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHW · top performer

Curtis Mead
1B
4-3
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MIN · top performer

Royce Lewis
3B
4-1
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .275 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .266 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .289 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .281 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .229 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .286 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .253 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .238 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 35 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 21 | |
| 1.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 149 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .272 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .258 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| .210 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .310 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .244 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .230 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .197 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .179 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .268 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .110 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .211 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 34 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 69 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 31 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 143 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
MIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
12
Hits
8
6
Runs
5
2
Errors
1
Current series
CHW win series 5-2
Season series
Series tied 5-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Top 8th Inning
C. Mead
1BBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 1 R · 1.500 OPS
F. Ellard
RPStarting pitcher
1.2 IP · 2 K · 0 ER · 3 BB
R. Lewis
3BBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
B. Ober
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CHW beat MIN 6-5. Tauchman's play in the top 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIN vs CHW
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMeidroth · homered to left center (395 feet), Mead scored.
Lee · singled to left, Martin scored.
Tauchman · doubled to center, Baldwin scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MIN | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Period scoring
CHW won 3 · MIN won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Meidroth 2
Buxton 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Jeffers 1
Inn 5
Tauchman 1
Inn 6
Lewis 1
Inn 7
Lee 1
Inn 8
Baldwin 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 597 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHW 6·MIN 5
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Keaschall struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
−7pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Luke Keaschall
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Martin flied out to center.BIG MOMENT
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
−9pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Austin Martin
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Jeffers struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
−8pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Ryan Jeffers
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHW 6·MIN 5
Middle of the 9th inning
CHW 6·MIN 5
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Montgomery flied out to right.
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 6·MIN 5
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
MIN
Home
6
Runs
5
12
Hits
8
2
Errors
1
22
TB
14
2
HR
1
3
BB
5
5
K
9
19
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 83 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.9%
ensemble · MIN favored
Elo Static
57.1%
P(MIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.1%
P(MIN win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.8%
P(MIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.42 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.