
PIT
47-62

SF
54-55
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
PIT
league avg
SF
.739
OPS
.715
.727
.334
OBP
.319
.308
5.06
Runs / G
4.50
4.13
4.26
Team ERA
4.16
4.54
1.31
WHIP
1.31
1.41
9.1
K / 9
8.5
8.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
PIT 2 · SF 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked SF +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 10th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates went into San Francisco Giants and beat them, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
4-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
SF · top performer

Dominic Smith
DH
4-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .244 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .232 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .217 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| .253 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| .175 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .250 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .265 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 36 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 14 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 91 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 26 | |
| Team | 10.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 136 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .219 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .238 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .237 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .265 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .248 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .242 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .231 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .205 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 34 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 109 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 | |
| Team | 10.0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 180 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
SF
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
6
2
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 3-0
Season series
PIT leads series 3-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Bottom 10th Inning
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1.100 OPS
M. Burrows
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 7 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 1 BB
D. Smith
DHBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1.000 OPS
L. Webb
SPStarting pitcher11-K game
5.2 IP · 11 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 4 BB
How it ended
PIT beat SF 2-1. Bailey's play in the bottom 10th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Last play
End of the 10th inning
Win probability
SF vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHorwitz · doubled to center, Kiner-Falefa scored.
Horwitz · singled to right.
Bailey · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
PIT won 2 · SF won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Smith 1
Inn 5
Horwitz 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Inn 10
Davis 1
Play-by-play · 612 plays
End of the 10th inning
PIT 2·SF 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Ramos struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
−23pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Isaac Mattson pitches to Heliot Ramos
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Bailey struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
−27pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Isaac Mattson pitches to Patrick Bailey
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Yastrzemski hit sacrifice bunt to third, Schmitt to second, Lee to third.
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
+3pp
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Isaac Mattson pitches to Mike Yastrzemski
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Schmitt singled to left.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
+11pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Isaac Mattson pitches to Casey Schmitt
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Bottom of the 10th inning
PIT 2·SF 1
Middle of the 10th inning
PIT 2·SF 1
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Peguero grounded out to second.
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 2·SF 1
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
SF
Home
2
Runs
1
7
Hits
6
0
Errors
0
8
TB
6
0
HR
0
7
BB
1
14
K
10
29
LOB
14
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 69 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
52.4%
ensemble · SF favored
Elo Static
52.7%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.5%
P(SF win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
53.5%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.38 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.