
CHC
60-43

CHW
38-66
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHC
league avg
CHW
.721
OPS
.715
▶.742
.331
OBP
.319
.329
4.53
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.79
4.29
Team ERA
4.16
4.25
1.25
WHIP
1.31
1.30
8.1
K / 9
8.5
▶8.2
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
CHC 5 · CHW 12 (by 7)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +11pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| CHW | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox held off Chicago Cubs, 12–5. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Reese McGuire
C
4-3
AB-H
1
R
4
RBI
CHW · top performer

Chase Meidroth
2B
5-3
AB-H
3
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .280 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .275 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .254 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .268 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .224 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .253 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .286 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .243 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .214 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .208 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 34 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 85 | |
| 2.0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 47 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 16 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 185 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .256 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .243 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .277 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .235 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .229 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .267 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .283 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .220 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .273 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .173 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .217 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 42 | 12 | 18 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 83 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 28 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 126 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
CHW
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
18
5
Runs
12
1
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
CHC lead series 3-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 16pp · Bottom 1st Inning
R. McGuire
CBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
3.0 IP · 2 K · 7 ER · 12 H
C. Meidroth
2BBatter of the game
3-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.800 OPS
A. Houser
SPStarting pitcher
6.2 IP · 3 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
How it ended
CHW beat CHC 12-5.
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMeidroth · homered to left (370 feet).
Sosa · singled to left, Quero scored and Slater scored, Vargas to second.
Slater · homered to center (420 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| CHW | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 12 |
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
CHW
Home
5
Runs
12
9
Hits
18
1
Errors
0
13
TB
33
1
HR
4
4
BB
1
4
K
8
20
LOB
21
Win probability
CHW vs CHC
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · CHW won 5
Inn 1
Sosa 2
Inn 2
Montgomery 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Tauchman 2
Inn 5
Quero 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
McGuire 3
Inn 8
Baldwin 1
Inn 9
McGuire 1
Play-by-play · 610 plays
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Berti grounded out to first.
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Steven Wilson pitches to Jon Berti
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Tucker walked, Hoerner scored, Bruján to second, McGuire to third.
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Steven Wilson pitches to Kyle Tucker
· ·
CHC 5·CHW 12
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Busch struck out swinging.
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 8 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Steven Wilson pitches to Michael Busch
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Bruján singled to center, McGuire to second, Hoerner to third.
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 4·CHW 12
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 82 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
40.1%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
39.4%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
39.9%
P(CHW win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
40.1%
P(CHW win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.30 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.