
DET
60-42

PIT
41-61
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
DET
league avg
PIT
.705
OPS
.717
▶.737
.315
OBP
.319
▶.335
4.06
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.99
3.94
Team ERA
4.18
4.22
1.28
WHIP
1.31
1.30
8.2
K / 9
8.5
▶9.1
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
DET 5 · PIT 8 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked DET +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| PIT | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates held off Detroit Tigers, 8–5.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
DET · top performer

Jahmai Jones
DH
1-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
4-3
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .251 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .286 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .276 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .239 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .273 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .190 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .273 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .167 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .260 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .209 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 36 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 86 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 46 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 165 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .249 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .265 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .234 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .254 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .215 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .243 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .214 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| .182 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .274 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 40 | 8 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 89 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 27 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 18 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 158 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantDET
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
14
5
Runs
8
3
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 3-0
Season series
PIT leads series 3-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
J. Jones
DHBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 HR · 5.000 OPS
C. Mize
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 5 K · 4 ER · 10 H · 1 BB
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 2 R · 1.550 OPS
M. Keller
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 5 K · 3 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
How it ended
PIT beat DET 8-5. Horwitz's play in the bottom 2nd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
PIT vs DET
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHorwitz · doubled to center, Hayes scored and Davis scored, Kiner-Falefa to third.
Kiner-Falefa · flied out to center.
Rogers · homered to center (407 feet), Meadows scored and Báez scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| PIT | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
DET won 2 · PIT won 4
Inn 1
Inn 2
Horwitz 2
Inn 3
Cruz 1
Inn 4
Reynolds 1
Inn 5
Rogers 3
Inn 6
Reynolds 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Jones 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 625 plays
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Greene struck out swinging.
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
+4pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
David Bednar pitches to Riley Greene
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pérez struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
+6pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
David Bednar pitches to Wenceel Perez
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Torres singled to right, Sweeney to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
−6pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
David Bednar pitches to Gleyber Torres
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Keith flied out to left.
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
+4pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
David Bednar pitches to Colt Keith
· ·
DET 5·PIT 8
·
DET 5·PIT 8
Sweeney walked.
·
DET 5·PIT 8
−5pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
DET 5·PIT 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
DET 5·PIT 8
Team stats
DET
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
5
Runs
8
10
Hits
14
3
Errors
0
19
TB
22
2
HR
0
4
BB
4
11
K
10
19
LOB
27
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
129
projections · 92 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
41.9%
ensemble · DET favored
Elo Static
43.5%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
43.1%
P(PIT win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
43.2%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.17 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.